Gae
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2016
- Messages
- 372
- Reaction score
- 2,489
Look guys, this is REALLY, REALLY frustrating, the little information that the police have released. We can only speculate, and I don't think some of the speculation is helpful.
If we knew more about the COD, then we could draw more reliable inferences about the crime. (Accident, panic, passion, revenge). For instance, some of you are speculating that it was a gunshot. The only thing the police have said is what? A blow to the head with an unknown instrument? Could a bullet be that instrument? I guess it could. Or it could be the hammer, or a barbell, or a pan from the kitchen. WE DON'T KNOW.
I guess I just want to remind everyone that we can make inferences, but we should try our best not to STACK inferences. KWIM?
Anyway, my two cents.
Bill Carson, I think this is the kind of thing LE was referring to, when they said all the speculation about the cause/origin of the gait wasn't helpful. We've stacked inferences and speculation so much, that we had the perp fashioned into someone that would virtually eliminate every real possibility! When we say things like this is someone with a prosthetic, who used to be a dancer, or whatever - then people stop looking for someone more realistic. Not pointing fingers, because I'm just as guilty with my boot covers and crossbows, but we should really try to be more careful about stacking the inferences to the point no one fits that description.
Thanks for the reminder, Bill.