Hi all, glad to see activity in this case, even if it's somewhat minimal. I was leaning pretty hard towards some level of indirect involvement from Missy's husband or his family for a number of reasons, but have to admit as more and more time passes and the continued insistence of LE of them as non-suspects, my belief in that theory is waning. The next set of suspects would be those who with whom she had been romantically involved with outside her marriage and/or their spouses, and despite their keeping the possibility of SWATperp being a woman, nothing about this crime feels "feminine" to me - the break-in, the SWAT gear, the weapon (presumably), the level of violence, the nonchalance, etc. Not to say the planning/mastermind behind the operation couldn't have been a woman. I also just don't subscribe to the burglary gone wrong theory. It feels personal, very personal. I got nothing. I hope LE has more than that!
But I continue to find the marked contrast between the two families' approaches to this tragedy very interesting. Complete silence from Missy's family and continued rehashing of Missy's affairs under the guise of magnamious forgiveness from the Bevers camp. Perhaps it means nothing other than journalists who can't drop the subject, or perhaps it means...something. Like a splinter broken off at the tip but still lingering under the skin.
Although it feels like an eternity, 6 months is not THAT long in what seems like a complex case. Hopefully it won't be a real eternity for justice for Missy.
