gregjrichards
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2010
- Messages
- 12,485
- Reaction score
- 70,543
I'm so sorry Corrie has missed this but I wish his baby, partner and family my congratulations.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Be interesting to know what...https://www.google.com/amp/www.mirr...s/police-only-halfway-through-corrie-10530893
"Mr McKeague said there remained "hard evidence" to suggest Corrie would be found at the site, which has been combed by specially trained officers since March 6."
No indication what the evidence is, but MM seems convinced by it.
If CM is found there could be a chance that there would be charges of corporate negligence of some sort.
As the UK swelters under what generally passes as a heatwave here (30 centigrade) spare a thought for the poor sods still digging up the landfill site amidst the stench of rotting rubbish.
According to the BBC, April's baby was born on 11th June http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-40319373?SThisFB
I put 11th June into a pregnancy calculator thing which said likely conception date would be 13th - 18th September. It would be nigh on impossible to have known she was pregnant before Corrie vanished. Of course the baby might have been very late (my first was 15 days over) in which case she might have realised.
Therefore a pointless post really :sigh: Hope April and baby are doing ok.
I put 11th June into a pregnancy calculator thing which said likely conception date would be 13th - 18th September. It would be nigh on impossible to have known she was pregnant before Corrie vanished. Of course the baby might have been very late (my first was 15 days over) in which case she might have realised.
Therefore a pointless post really :sigh: Hope April and baby are doing ok.
She likely conceived early Sept which means the weekend in London is when C knew. The 20 week scan in Jan would also tie inI don't believe MM would outright lie about CM knowing though, why would he? I think perhaps AO mentioned she might be pregnant but they'd discuss it properly after her holiday. So to NU AO wasn't "officially" pregnant until after CM went missing when she'd had a proper test. This is the only scenario that makes sense to me.
Yes that is how the calculation is worked out but the period of ovulation is the unknown quantity, as I understand, which can vary causing the early or late scenario I believe.Pregnancy is counted from the first date of the last period. Do these calculators purport to calculate from then or from actual conception? I should get a calendar out and figure this out, I suppose!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Corrie-McKeague-s-fiancee-announces-baby.html
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Worth remembering that Nicola said that April 'wasn't due yet' when she was admitted to hospital around 2nd June (according to quote in this article), which is only 9 days before the baby was born. So IMO not a late baby - and quite possibly delivered earlier than 40 weeks if they were taking steps to keep her pregnant / help baby grow only 9 days earlier (more likely to induce is there is a problem close to due date).
Why would they want to cover up whether C knew and also that he even had a girlfriend? I just don't get that I'm afraid. It could only have helped imo if they had announced that from the start.The whole not due yet but in hospital for stress could have been a story to cover up the story that CM didn't know.
There is a way to prove who is telling the truth as MM says the pregnancy is on police record but it's not like we can access that info.
Why would they want to cover up whether C knew and also that he even had a girlfriend? I just don't get that I'm afraid. It could only have helped imo if they had announced that from the start.