TruthWillOut, yes no factual evidence, like make and model of the CCTV camera to be absolutely sure etc. But the doc (I think I may only have caught the last five mins or so, or it was simply a very short doc) did show closeups of the CCTV system, which is clearly on an auto-rotation setting, even in daytime. No sign of any motion detection. Couldn't screen-cap it sorry. Doubt the police really want people to know the ins-and-outs of the CCTV system hence the clever and obfuscating cuts in the ID shots, the zero confirmation of its actual viewing time/angles of the Horseshoe and the fact the police and family say different things about CCTV in the area (police "not 100% covered", family "impossible to leave undetected") but as for the angles, rotation settings and stuff, they didn't figure it'd be scrutinized by me
![Wink ;) ;)]()
In Forces TV doc they also still talk about CCTV like we're all laymen that don't understand how cameras and watching video works (and she really needed to wipe that huge grin off her face..!).
PS. Shot 3. St John's is empty (no motion) so it should've swung to the group of 3 sooner, as it had no motion in one angle and motion in another, but it does not, for several seconds. It also doesn't track them down to the ground angle. If it has motion detection, its slow and rubbish at doing it, put it that way. It would also be over-sensitive in this mode, where does it look when it has someone in alley, someone on Brentgrovel and activity in St John's? Definitely on an auto-sweep mode of some kind. I'm certain of it. The workload for this camera is really more than it should be. Why they didn't have one above the Cornhill entrance I don't know, cos that would've closed the gap between Starbucks and Greenwoods cameras, and eased the workload of Greenwoods (and possibly Starbucks).