It should be allowed from this website:
...
'They went to Morrell court just off Foxwood Lane at approx 3.30pm to play in Morrell court. However approx 30 mins later after a frantic 999 call they were found in Alness drive with the younger girl having suffered very serious injuries.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...appeals-missing-30-minutes.html#ixzz4WE2Y8oAb
This changes the timeline slightly if Alison is looking for witnesses around 3:30pm – 4:00pm. MSM was quoting the first 999 call from the accused at 4:37pm and from Katie's mum 13 minutes later who said Katie had been missing for 45 mins. The accuracy of initial MSM reports is questionable, one stated Katie was found at 4:30pm.
Alison does suggest that the accused and the victim weren't where they were expected to be playing on Morrell Court, but half a mile away in an area which is accessed via a secluded woodland path (see my earlier post with map). To access that area via the path where Katie was found requires an extra 10 mins walk from Morrell court, the quickest route is via the woodland path suggesting that they didn't enter the area via the pathway where they were found but instead about half a mile across the field and up a path from a different road.
I don't think the assault occurred where Katie was found. The location in which Katie was found could have been the nearest housing area from the fields / woodland area if somebody needed help urgently. The fact that the accused was the first to call 999 and they were found in the same place suggests that after Katie suffered the injuries, they were both seeking help together and come from further into the field or woodland area after the incident.
So the question in my mind is about whether the two just being typical kids of that age and not playing exactly where they said they would be, but still local and in a well-known area - or did the accused deliberately lead the victim to that location with intent because it was the nearest secluded area to the housing estate and it was around sunset at that time? I think it makes a big difference and that’s why witnesses are sought for that time period.
And the knife explanation has two accounts that match with the above, it was either found just before the incident or in possession well in advance.
I would guess the accused has one of the following accounts of what happened, and I guess the family and the police are just as baffled as we are:
1. No comment
2. I don’t know / can’t remember what happened
3. Was playing, found the knife, accidental
4. Owned / carried / had easy access to a knife, got angry, didn’t realise how dangerous or serious it was going to be.
5. Deliberately took the knife and lured Katie to her death.