Cluella DeVille
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2021
- Messages
- 167
- Reaction score
- 917
Some great points. IMO R was definitely the second person through the gate, he has the correct dog breed that formed initial reports, though I'm really not convinced P was the first. Where man with fluffy white dog comes into the frame has not been elaborated upon, neither is it clear who the person sighting NB from a distance at 9.10...has that time now been verified as it was still being deliberated over? I do have my own theories on the latter two as well the first lady through the gateI have always found the timeframe between 9.33 to when PA received the call at 10.50 from the school strange. If I had been first on scene I would have been calling and checking the area/river to find the owner. I would have checked Willows collar for a tag.
I think there were a number of elderly witnesses involved around that time and it appears to have taken over an hour to raise the alert
Taking information from the police timeline and media reports:-
A lady (P) was first on the scene. Willow was loose in field. Phone was on bench. Harness (? and lead) were on the ground
A man (R) then was next at the scene. Phone still on bench and not on floor as previously reported
Both recognised Willow and had seen PA and NB walking her before but did not know them
P at some point rang R's wife which I presume was to see if she knew who the owners were
Someone also then rang the vets but they could not help
P tied up Willow as had to rush home to an appointment I don't know if R continued his walk or stayed at bench.
At some point P spoke to her DIL (who was friends with NB on Facebook). She knew who NB was and called the school who then rang PA
Another man with a white dog has been mentioned as being a witness and coming through the gate and seeing the phone on the ground 2ft from the bench. No idea where this fits into the timeframe
Like I said very confusing