bos
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2011
- Messages
- 588
- Reaction score
- 2,961
With all due respect, it may have come up at the inquest & just not have been reported. Even a properly trained journalist who can use short hand is going to report what they believe to be the salient points.That's a very good point. My concern on that would be why did it then stop at 9.30. If it can record steps when she was in the water producing motion movements when deceased, then surely this would continue after 9.30.The other aspect that concerns me re the Fitbit data is why did they only ask and report the highest recorded heartbeat (9.22),surely the most important time is the last recorded heartbeat ignoring the random irregular ones explained away. If they could come out and state the last recorded beats were at 9.22 then I'd very happily accept their explanation
Additionally, the coroner is likely to have the raw data/evidence in document form; as an experienced pathologist himself, he will have known what was relevant to ask to aid public/family understanding. MOO