I would love to hear from others sleuthers about what set of circumstances might match with what has been reported about EC.
According to the timeline:
+ EC was arrested alongside her husband on 9 March on suspicion of assisting an offender
+ There is no evidence to suggest any contact between EC and police prior to her arrest
+ She has been released on bail but must return in April
UK - Sarah Everard, 33, London, Clapham, 3rd Mar 2021 - TIMELINE *NO DISCUSSION*
I am curious what sort of ‘assisting an offender’ is possible in this situation. My own speculation:
+ I don’t believe she provided a false alibi as she was arrested before any questioning could have taken place
+ I don’t believe she was present for any parts of the crime or she would perhaps have been arrested for a more serious offense
This leaves smaller possible areas of ‘help’ that would have been less obviously criminal. Possibly:
+ Driving the defendant to / from car hire place?
+ Washing clothes that may have evidence?
+ Lying to police about the defendants health, unrelated to the SE case (I am thinking maybe something in relation to the reported call-in for ‘stress’ that WC reportedly made to his superior)
+ ????
None of these ideas fit well since Police would have needed to identify EC’s actions before any interviewing. What am I missing? What else is possible?
Of course, MOO
Last week was a rollercoaster of sad and angry new every day. New truths uncovered, new crime scenes discovered.....
Does anyone else have a heavy heart about what may be revealed this coming week?
Quoting myself because this horrible ‘sliding doors’ moment is keeping me awake.
Conversely, imagine if those dashcams had NOT caught the suspects car on camera. Sarah would still be missing and we might not have a clue what happened to her.
As charges of kidnap and murder have now been proffered, there will very limited or no comment from MSM, on further progress or evidence, due to the sub judice rule that is now in place.
^^ bbmGiven what we know about phone pings from Sarah’s last reported location, I’m wondering if some of the sites they’re searching could also have been triangulated from the Accused’s own phone history. I imagine any visits to areas of woodland or water during that time period would look suspect. But then that doesn’t really explain the sudden urgency to examine this latest site this evening, as presumably they’ve had this data for some time now.
A couple of random thoughts :
There's been speculation about the email sent to senior officers requesting to be relieved from firearms duty. This could be due to suicidal thoughts, or also fear that a pending arrest could turn into an armed police siege situation which could put the alleged perp and/or his family into danger.
Some posters have speculated on whether or not Sarah was wearing her Covid face mask when abducted. If she was, it might have been easy for the abductor to pull her mask up over her eyes, temporarily blinding and disorientating her while he bundled her into the car.
We have heard of a new search site this evening ,it is possible another one will also be discovered.
They are looking for something.We have heard of a new search site this evening ,it is possible another one will also be discovered.
To do that though, she would presumeably have a reason to suspect that he had done something wrong. Of course, he could have told her it was something minor.Speculation but maybe when LE arrived at the house she could have said he wasn’t home and when they looked in the house they saw him there? That seems like the rash spur-of-the-moment thing that might get you arrested but not charged.
We have heard of a new search site this evening ,it is possible another one will also be discovered.
Are there any foster parents in this scenario. I hope a parent not charged with a serious crime would be allowed to stay with their children. How awful it must be for those kids taken out of their home and may even be beds in the middle of the night.So..let's talk family. Not any in particular, just in cases like these. Would foster parents have to explain to the kids the events? Would a parent released on bail stay with the kids and would they receive govt protection?
Yes, dreadful really. Foster parents? How is this dealt with?Are there any foster parents in this scenario. I hope a parent not charged with a serious crime would be allowed to stay with their children. How awful it must be for those kids taken out of their home and may even be beds in the middle of the night.
I hope that they are with grandparents or family members.Yes, dreadful really. Foster parents? How is this dealt with?
Could that car have been hired in London? Just a thought I had when reading through previous threads?About the hire car, has it been reported that the police have it and are examining it? I believe its been reported that it was tracked back to Kent but if it was hired in Dover surely it would have been returned to Dover or it was left somewhere else. Only the two family cars were taken from the home so it wasn't there and surely with so many sites being investigated the media would have seen it being taken away from wherever it was?
I have never hired a car, but cant you hire them from one location and drop them off at the same agency in another location?Could that car have been hired in London? Just a thought I had when reading through previous threads?