I don’t know. Perhaps some of the locals on here can enlighten us. I’m a northerner like you. I think there was mention of a few things earlier in the thread. There’s always missing persons cases that don’t get press attention so who knows what police might be looking at.has there been any other cases in the area were a female has gone missing?
Not missing, but if you check the Balham Newsie FB page, a woman was attacked near to the Agnes Riley Gardens in January, and a woman gives an account of a man who followed her home in Brixton in February. Also another assault in Hydethorpe Road on January 14th.has there been any other cases in the area were a female has gone missing?
That is really a very long walk for a young woman to be taking alone by herself near 10 at night.
It is very surprising to me that the friend or the boyfriend would not have offered a ride or even an Uber.
I don’t know. Perhaps some of the locals on here can enlighten us. I’m a northerner like you. I think there was mention of a few things earlier in the thread. There’s always missing persons cases that don’t get press attention so who knows what police might be looking at.
I’m not certain, but I think the walking pace was calculated on the CCTV sighting being bang on the Cavendish Rd junction, due to the use of the word “from” in the article(s). If you (like me) take it to mean further along the A205, nearer towards the Clarence Ave phone mast, the pace is slightly quicker.This is a scary case and I fear for Sarah’s safety.
Also, the sleuthing here has been really top notch - especially the local insights and the review of publicly available traffic cam footage. I hope it helps to find SE.
I have two thoughts that I have not seen discussed much that I would be curious to hear others opinions on:
1. Upthread it was mentioned that SE traveled from her friends house to CCTV sighting - about 1.2mi / 1.9km in 30 minutes. That pace is 2.4 mph or 3.8 kph. Does this seem right for the area? I would guess SE’s walking pace to be considerably faster, but I don’t have a sense of how many stoplights / how often she would have needed to stop for traffic.
My ideas:
+ Did she stop into a takeaway shop for a wee or to pick up a snack?
+ Did someone possibly follow her out?
2. I think the dead phone is important evidence - suggesting foul play.
My ideas:
+ I am about Sarah’s age, similar career, and also live alone in a city. I would walk home alone in the dark frequently. My friends may or may not ask me to send a “got home safe” text.
+ I would never walk home 50 min with a low battery phone, especially if I’d been at a friends where I could do a quick charge before leaving
+ SE presumably saw the battery life of her phone when she initiated or answered the call from her partner. I would have kept the call short to conserve battery or asked to speak later so I knew I’d have a working phone the entirety of the walk
+ Given this, I tend not to think her phone died - it is of course possible, but I think less likely
What do others think?
So something we're not allowed to see happened up by Brixton Water Lane between 20:34-20:50 and at 23:45
Brixton Hill Lambert Rd/2021-03-03 - TfL JamCams Archive
EDIT to add - there's actually loads of censored stills on that day from this camera
This is a scary case and I fear for Sarah’s safety.
Also, the sleuthing here has been really top notch - especially the local insights and the review of publicly available traffic cam footage. I hope it helps to find SE.
I have two thoughts that I have not seen discussed much that I would be curious to hear others opinions on:
1. Upthread it was mentioned that SE traveled from her friends house to CCTV sighting - about 1.2mi / 1.9km in 30 minutes. That pace is 2.4 mph or 3.8 kph. Does this seem right for the area? I would guess SE’s walking pace to be considerably faster, but I don’t have a sense of how many stoplights / how often she would have needed to stop for traffic.
My ideas:
+ Did she stop into a takeaway shop for a wee or to pick up a snack?
+ Did someone possibly follow her out?
2. I think the dead phone is important evidence - suggesting foul play.
My ideas:
+ I am about Sarah’s age, similar career, and also live alone in a city. I would walk home alone in the dark frequently. My friends may or may not ask me to send a “got home safe” text.
+ I would never walk home 50 min with a low battery phone, especially if I’d been at a friends where I could do a quick charge before leaving
+ SE presumably saw the battery life of her phone when she initiated or answered the call from her partner. I would have kept the call short to conserve battery or asked to speak later so I knew I’d have a working phone the entirety of the walk
+ Given this, I tend not to think her phone died - it is of course possible, but I think less likely
What do others think?
This is a scary case and I fear for Sarah’s safety.
Also, the sleuthing here has been really top notch - especially the local insights and the review of publicly available traffic cam footage. I hope it helps to find SE.
I have two thoughts that I have not seen discussed much that I would be curious to hear others opinions on:
1. Upthread it was mentioned that SE traveled from her friends house to CCTV sighting - about 1.2mi / 1.9km in 30 minutes. That pace is 2.4 mph or 3.8 kph. Does this seem right for the area? I would guess SE’s walking pace to be considerably faster, but I don’t have a sense of how many stoplights / how often she would have needed to stop for traffic.
My ideas:
+ Did she stop into a takeaway shop for a wee or to pick up a snack?
+ Did someone possibly follow her out?
2. I think the dead phone is important evidence - suggesting foul play.
My ideas:
+ I am about Sarah’s age, similar career, and also live alone in a city. I would walk home alone in the dark frequently. My friends may or may not ask me to send a “got home safe” text.
+ I would never walk home 50 min with a low battery phone, especially if I’d been at a friends where I could do a quick charge before leaving
+ SE presumably saw the battery life of her phone when she initiated or answered the call from her partner. I would have kept the call short to conserve battery or asked to speak later so I knew I’d have a working phone the entirety of the walk
+ Given this, I tend not to think her phone died - it is of course possible, but I think less likely
What do others think?
That is really a very long walk for a young woman to be taking alone by herself near 10 at night.
It is very surprising to me that the friend or the boyfriend would not have offered a ride or even an Uber.
perhaps a car of interest (containing perp) was seen moving into position at the earlier time and then see again leaving at the later time - perhaps the perp lived nearby - if a car came out of Lambeth road into Brixton hill then turned into Brixton water lane they can then track it onwards from there
That is really a very long walk for a young woman to be taking alone by herself near 10 at night.
It is very surprising to me that the friend or the boyfriend would not have offered a ride or even an Uber.
Just had a thought when I saw the park.. I need to pee quite often when I drink wine, I know it wouldn’t be a good move but what if she was absolutely busting and she nipped into the park.. I mean I think I would rather pee myself than do that but I’m scared of the dark in my own house, maybe she’s not the type to fear things like that.
Probably a total stupid thought but I’m just going by how often I need, even if I had gone before I left my friends, the wine, the cold and the walk would prob make me need again.
Yes I had the same thought this afternoon. Missing persons cases are normally under rather than over resourced as sadly we all know. There surely must be a lot going on behind the scenes here.
has there been any other cases in the area were a female has gone missing?
When I had an older phone, I didn't have much storage left and keeping it charged was a really strict regular routine because once it dropped below 40%, it would quickly go to shutdown. If her phone was older and she left the friend's with a dropping charge, she might have turned off for the bit where she felt safest just so she'd have it back for the last end of the trip.
I'm assuming she regularly walked to or from this friend's place and knew how long it would take. Do we even know how often she would make this trip and / or if she had ever made this trip this late at night before.
Since I got a new phone I have not had nearly the battery issues and would feel comfortable with it on at all times.
I watched the CCTV for the day and there were at least 5 of the grey / censored / unavailable sections. It makes me think they may not be as meaningful as we think. Perhaps this grey screen can also mean loss of feed or other tech issues