No it isn't two, it's one. My point is that all we know is that a 39 year old man was arrested and then bailed on suspicion of assisting an offender.
It is the press who have named him and said he was the one who saw TS leaving the house.
What if that's wrong? What if the female witness is the person who was the single uncorroborated witness.
The 39 year old man must then have been arrested for some other reason.
That's what I'm trying to suggest. And what would the reason be?