ScotsPaddy
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2012
- Messages
- 587
- Reaction score
- 94
Lol i give up.
I'm pretty sure he was named on the electoral role (along with others members of the family) - I believe a fellow poster found this earlier on 192.com (or similar)
So, if we assume that SH & CS did visit the fairground (as they told us they did) and we believe what the fairground staff told us (that nobody asked after a missing girl) we could assume that they told the police about the fairground "hunt" due to CCTV concerns - i.e. sightings of their car and possibly themselves.
It would then be safe to assume they were there for another reason. It may be that travellers would not lower themselves to crimes of child murder or hiding a child, but I'm sure for a fee they would lend a vehicle (or similar) to their mate/acquaintance?
I think they both went there for help of SOME sort.
So if SH went there for help, why do you think no one backed up his story?
We don't know that nobody has backed this up. We have only had press reports denying that anyone asked about a missing child. If SH & CS went there looking for a friend, why would there be anyone to back it up. Unless they found their friend (it's possible they didn't).
My point is this whole fair story leads me to believe that CS at least knew what had happened to Tia.
Inclined to agree with you on that Moby.
2. They were meeting someone at the fair, but probably someone that they could meet * outside* of the fair itself. Would explain why the fair people at the gate didnt see them
From the Ancestry.co.uk website:
Tia Christine Sharp, born Jul 2000 (so she was only just twelve).
Interesting that her middle name was Christine; suggests a very close knit family IMO. Makes me less inclined to believe CS was involved in her death/a cover up.
From the Ancestry.co.uk website:
Tia Christine Sharp, born Jul 2000 (so she was only just twelve).
Interesting that her middle name was Christine; suggests a very close knit family IMO. Makes me less inclined to believe CS was involved in her death/a cover up.
The first thing that I did was prepare a genealogy chart for this family (before TS was found) as it is an area I am used to dabbling with, and it helps me to understand the dynamics of their family. I did post about this in the early days, but so far I did not find out too much, except something stumping me regarding how nobody has been interested (press, blogs etc) in CS's 2nd husband, as he and SH were living under that roof at the same time, and he could possibly have a key to the property.....just a thought. Also, would like to understand what kind of relationship he had with the rest of the family.Well I think it's less and less common for children to take family names as their middles, and I imagine that the Sharps defied tradition in more ways than one, so that was just a thought. Crazy Mama's post though suggests it was a family tradition.
The first thing that I did was prepare a genealogy chart for this family (before TS was found) as it is an area I am used to dabbling with, and it helps me to understand the dynamics of their family. I did post about this in the early days, but so far I did not find out too much, except something stumping me regarding how nobody has been interested (press, blogs etc) in CS's 2nd husband, as he and SH were living under that roof at the same time, and he could possibly have a key to the property.....just a thought. Also, would like to understand what kind of relationship he had with the rest of the family.
What I have is CS, DS, NS, TS, SH & DA (CS's husband no.2) all living in the house in c.2002I thought I was on top of this, but I'm clearly not.
So TS's dad is CS's first husband? No, her dad is SC. So since they split CS remarried, then SH moved in to that house, then CS split form her second husband?
Is that right?
A "SICK" internet troll has been condemned for impersonating Tia Sharp's mother on Facebook.
A Facebook user calling themselves "Tia Sharp" set up the support page, saying they were the dead 12-year-old's mother and attacking those who doubted the claims.