katydid23
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 68,514
- Reaction score
- 250,805
Which is what his rape victim described.Or she was "done" and he wouldn't stop...
Which is what his rape victim described.Or she was "done" and he wouldn't stop...
It seems unlikely but maybe he was dumb enough to think that by destroying her phone there wouldn’t be a way to connect him to her?I dont know what to think though specifically regarding this. He wasnt stupid. He was familiar with technology and how things work. I'm sure he was intelligent enough to know everything was going to track back to him but he still murdered her anyways. That's the scary part. I would like to know what happened.
Those park cameras were never functioning cameras - only dummies. However, he could've been aware of that fact.
Randomly his last Venmo purchase (b/f the legal consult) was for fertilizer. I'm assuming for his yard? So maybe he was trying to take care of the deteriorating lawn?I believe one of the early reports about the fires from neighbors said that he recently had quit taking care of his yard.
IMHO fits with a psychological decline
In most cases, you’re probably right.
This guy had to have known though. He was in IT, and murder aside, he’s not a complete dolt.
He appears to have put a great deal of thought into this, and taken certain measures to conceal his connection to her.
I continue to believe that he was behind Kenzie's phone going dead.
So I just don’t know what to make of his errors here.
Here’s the thing we are all making an assumption that he’s an IT guy- we know his resume was falsified based on MSM - he wasn’t educated in IT (no degree- attended various times at college(s)) had a bunch of cameras at his house (so do I -you can get them at Costco etc) and he worked as a support person best we can tell - I’m of the opinion he wasn’t well versed with technology and it did not occur to him that his phone would be a treasure trove of evidence - remember he only disabled her phone based on what we know - I’m thinking he just isn’t as clever smart educated and knowledgeable about the IT world he claimed to be in (resume and LinkedIn) all JMO - and plus his general arrogance he has that in common with the other men who killed their wives/girlfriends IMOIn most cases, you’re probably right.
This guy had to have known though. He was in IT, and murder aside, he’s not a complete dolt.
He appears to have put a great deal of thought into this, and taken certain measures to conceal his connection to her.
I continue to believe that he was behind Kenzie's phone going dead.
So I just don’t know what to make of his errors here.
Everyone should read Gavin DeBecker's "Gift of Fear."
I agree with you. I think considering he set up plans to meet her at a park, with a witness right there (the Lyft driver), that it was not a premeditated murder. IMO something went wrong that night and she rejected his advances or he simply took things too far. His actions after the fact, trying to cover up the evidence and burning the body, I certainly do not think were planned out. I believe he was in panic mode and truly thought that would be the best way to dispose of the evidence.MOO the evidence he left behind does point to kidnap then an unplanned killing than complete premeditation, and is more consistent with what others have said about his volatile violence when not getting his way.
MOO it was easy to see from her corpse that he was responsible for her death. So he burned the corpse, not intending to get away with it completely but to hide how he murdered her.
Brad, He really could have started to slip off the deep end psychologically...which would explain why he become so reckless with his behavior and actions...everything he did leading up to the murder, as well as his ridiculous attempts to get rid of evidence points to a deteriorating thinking process, in my opinion.
We do have verified psychologists but I don’t recall any are following this case ? I will try and remember the one on Kelsey’s thread and tag them when I figure it out or if someone else knows please doSlightly off topic. I’m just curious. Are there any verified psychologists on here who are familiar with how grief impacts risk?
It seems from news articles that several friends don’t think she would meet a stranger at 3am but I’m curious if grief would impact this at all?
I’ve experienced grief in the past that definitely affected my ability to assess risks but I don’t know if this is a thing or just something with me.
Just to be clear, with this monster, I’m convinced the time of day of the meeting was irrelevant to the outcome.
MOO
And the hits keep coming.IMO his appearance has also declined dramatically, too.
The owner of a talent agency described him as “very good looking,” just last year:
“E.K. said Ajayi, an avid bodybuilder and wannabe model, first approached her at a networking event for models and their agents last summer. She said he wanted to sign with her agency, but there was something about him that she found off-putting.”
"On the surface, he seemed perfect," K. told Inside Edition. "He seemed very smart. Very good looking. Very well-spoken."
Modeling Agency Owner Says Mackenzie Lueck Murder Suspect Made Her 'Uncomfortable in My
In most cases, you’re probably right.
This guy had to have known though. He was in IT, and murder aside, he’s not a complete dolt.
He appears to have put a great deal of thought into this, and taken certain measures to conceal his connection to her.
I continue to believe that he was behind Kenzie's phone going dead.
So I just don’t know what to make of his errors here.
Here’s the thing we are all making an assumption that he’s an IT guy- we know his resume was falsified based on MSM - he wasn’t educated in IT (no degree- attended various times at college(s)) had a bunch of cameras at his house (so do I -you can get them at Costco etc) and he worked as a support person best we can tell - I’m of the opinion he wasn’t well versed with technology and it did not occur to him that his phone would be a treasure trove of evidence - remember he only disabled her phone based on what we know - I’m thinking he just isn’t as clever smart educated and knowledgeable about the IT world he claimed to be in (resume and LinkedIn) all JMO - and plus his general arrogance he has that in common with the other men who killed their wives/girlfriends IMO
In most cases, you’re probably right.
This guy had to have known though. He was in IT, and murder aside, he’s not a complete dolt.
He appears to have put a great deal of thought into this, and taken certain measures to conceal his connection to her.
I continue to believe that he was behind Kenzie's phone going dead.
So I just don’t know what to make of his errors here.
IMHO, hooking up the cameras in Hatch park, and in every other public park in the city would be a great way to honor Kenzie and possibly prevent future crimes.According to a park official that was interviewed a few weeks ago...the cameras were put up at the park in non-working order only as a visual deterrent...the suspect lived across the street from the park at one time...he might have known that the cameras weren't hooked up.
Yeah, I think the extent of his IT knowlege was telling people how to turn their computer off and then back on again.
There had to be texts to her, from him, telling her to meet him at the park. Even if he had turned his own phone off, what was his plan for covering that up?
We do have verified psychologists but I don’t recall any are following this case ? I will try and remember the one on Kelsey’s thread and tag them when I figure it out or if someone else knows please do
Cannot agree more - they document the crime IMOcameras don't prevent crime, they just document it when it happens. moo