VA - Amy Bradley, 23, Petersburg, 24 March 1998 - #2 - ***READ FIRST POST***

[nosyone]

I had a thought that maybe since the picture, which was obviously different from the normal pictures on the adult site, was put there as a revenge (can't think of a better word) against Zaglanitis and/or Baxter from a competitor or someone who felt double-crossed by them. I just can't help but think it was put there to stick out like a sore thumb to attract attention. Thinking with my keyboard.

 

[Sapphire]

They're not, sapphire. Not at all. Wanted to note that just bc stuff isn't on here yet doesn't mean it isn't being worked on. Worked on indepth ...

Glad you're keeping Zaglanitis and Baxter in the forefront of your research. Looking forward to your results!

 

[Jersey*Girl]

Chateau, that is an incorrect AD.

 

[Sapphire]

I have sent this lead in to multiple people without any response whatsoever. I was using a verified poster's recommendations as far as leads go , and was trying to dig into some POI's that were named.

I feel this is worth sleuthing , it may or may not be related ... I do feel it is worth a look JMO.

LinkedIn*

<modsnip>

*******NOW HERE IS WHERE THIS GETS VERY CREEPY********









Link :*http://whocallsme.com/Phone-Number.aspx/08454591010/2

This is not the same Alister Douglas associated with Amy's case.

 

[Chorley8]

[/COLOR][/B]


I agree Jaime. It's important to keep focus on Zaglanitis and Paul Baxter. The verified member said they are connected to the escort site that put up Amy's picture. There are many theories being shared here. IMO, these two important names should not get lost among the theories. JMO

What are we trying to achieve? To find their locations and interview them ourselves? Get a PI? Find their locations and give to the FBI who as has been suggested won't act if they are in say Canada? Send in info to the family? I don't mind helping but am not sure what we are trying to achieve.

 

[Chorley8]

I had a thought that maybe since the picture, which was obviously different from the normal pictures on the adult site, was put there as a revenge (can't think of a better word) against Zaglanitis and/or Baxter from a competitor or someone who felt double-crossed by them. I just can't help but think it was put there to stick out like a sore thumb to attract attention. Thinking with my keyboard.

I agree with you that it will probably be a dead end. I agree with others that it is worth trying. Again would just like to know what the goal is because much of what we are trying to achieve might take some asking around and it is essential to be clear what the goals are. There is some slight risk involved but I do not think everything can be done just on-line IMO.

 

[Sapphire]

What are we trying to achieve? To find their locations and interview them ourselves? Get a PI? Find their locations and give to the FBI who as has been suggested won't act if they are in say Canada? Send in info to the family? I don't mind helping but am not sure what we are trying to achieve.

IMO, it's important to find these people associated with the ongoing investigation and hand them over to the proper authorities. Their connections might even be of more importance.

The US has an Extradition Treaty with Canada.


http://www.oas.org/juridico/mla/en/usa/index.html

 

[JaimeSommers]

What are we trying to achieve? To find their locations and interview them ourselves?

It is absolutely not my intent to take my own action. It's also a gigantic no-no as a WS member.

Anything uncovered should be shared with the Bradleys and the FBI. Period.

 

[ChateauMarmont]

Just stumbled upon this ...

On the Monday after Amy was to get back from the cruise, she was to start working as a marketing and office assistant for Mary and her husband Mike, who own a software company.

Now that seems it's a possible clue when looked at along side my post re: AD/Marketing connection ...

http://web.archive.org/web/20060814010912/http://www.richmond.com/output.aspx?article_id=1668

 

[JaimeSommers]

Found the widow's peak info. Am reposting it here purely as an FYI -- the verified poster felt they were the same; however, the pics are such poor quality that (for me) it's hard to tell definitively either way.

Originally Posted by JaimeSommers
Can someone with a computer monitor help me out? Here is a photo of Amy with longer hair (pulled from the family's Web site). She has a bit of a widow's peak, yes? Isn't the same widow's peak evident in this second photo? (Hopefully Tapatalk will let me attach both images.)

I think the hairline looks the same.

 

[Chorley8]

It is absolutely not my intent to take my own action. It's also a gigantic no-no as a WS member.

Anything uncovered should be shared with the Bradleys and the FBI. Period.

Just want to be clear on this. If I were to ask someone in Toronto Hamilton "do you know anyone named Z." or where they lived would that be an "action?". As opposed to cyber-sleuthing? If so I am assuming the key issue is anonymity? Just want to be clear on this. But frankly I think the FBI can easily find these two characters they can liason with Canadian police they would be glad to help I am sure. Now since there seems to be a disconnect between the FBI and Iva and Ron it might still be useful to give them info the FBI is not sharing with them? Is that the issue? Again sorry for this but want to be clear.

One question: is Amy on any interpol alert I remember in Toronto missing Georgian woman Mariam Makhniashili was on an Interpol alert I think that really opens up a lot of options for investigators.

Because as I understand a Canadian could then contact Interpol or Canadian police say the RCMP to give them info on B and Z?

 

[Jersey*Girl]

:what:

Found the widow's peak info. Am reposting it here purely as an FYI -- the verified poster felt they were the same; however, the pics are such poor quality that (for me) it's hard to tell definitively either way.

View attachment 26733
View attachment 26734

Not at all to me when you see a lighter picture such as this, her widow's peak is very prominent...

 

[~n/t~]

Maybe I'm confused but I thought the sources of the photos were already determined and the FBI have located the individuals and they were questioned and denied any involvement with this case. My understanding is they did not know how the photos appeared on their website and the location where the photos were allegedly taken was checked out and does not exist.

So my question is why is the focus still on PB and AZ? Do we think they lied to the FBI? Would the FBI just take their word for it?

I agree with the poster who asked what our role is. It appears the FBI should be the ones following up on all these leads but they're not getting anywhere. Why? Surely they have much better intelligence devices than we do.

IMO, I think our focus should be on locating the suspects on the sketches. Perhaps that approach could lead us to the source.

The big big problem is:

These men are now in their 50's. The sketches are over 8 years old (?) Amy's sketch is also outdated.

There haven't been any Amy sightings in years. Why? Why were they so "visible" for a while and then it stopped? Did they finally achieve what they wanted out of Amy? Are her handlers dead or in prison? Did they hide Amy or kill her?

Last but not least, Y seems to be the most obvious person of interest in this case but yet for whatever reason, he's able to go on with an alleged inconclusive or passed polygraph even though he was the last one to have been seen with Amy.

I don't get it. Why aren't they pursuing him?

 

[~n/t~]

Can someone please tell me how it was determined that person with the same name as the person of interest in this case is not the same person?

TIA

 

[JaimeSommers]

Did Amy have a boyfriend or not?

Respectfully snipped for space.

In case this helps, Jersey. (BBM)

Originally Posted by Lera213
what was Amy's line of work? Was she a CPA or something like that?

Originally Posted by FindAmy
Amy graduated from Longwood University with a four year athletic scholarship. She earned a degree in education, but she was preparing to begin a job with a computer company, at the end of the cruise. She was also preparing to begin graduate school for a master's degree.

Amy had a wonderful boyfriend. She had just moved to a new apartment and purchased a car she loved. She adopted a dog and planned to pickup the dog when she returned from the cruise. She was a very successful young woman and she had a great future ahead of her.

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=8280682"]SPOTLIGHT CASE VA - Amy Bradley, 23, Petersburg, 24 March 1998 - Page 12 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

 

[~n/t~]

Just want to be clear on this. If I were to ask someone in Toronto Hamilton "do you know anyone named Z." or where they lived would that be an "action?". As opposed to cyber-sleuthing? If so I am assuming the key issue is anonymity? Just want to be clear on this. But frankly I think the FBI can easily find these two characters they can liason with Canadian police they would be glad to help I am sure. Now since there seems to be a disconnect between the FBI and Iva and Ron it might still be useful to give them info the FBI is not sharing with them? Is that the issue? Again sorry for this but want to be clear.

One question: is Amy on any interpol alert I remember in Toronto missing Georgian woman Mariam Makhniashili was on an Interpol alert I think that really opens up a lot of options for investigators.

Because as I understand a Canadian could then contact Interpol or Canadian police say the RCMP to give them info on B and Z?

Amy is on Interpol site

http://www.interpol.int/Missing-Per...Eyes_Color=&IPSGT_Hair=&free=&missing_search=


I posted links to Interpol and the RCMP early on to see if any of the Wanted Persons matched any of the persons of interest in this case.

None that I could find but a new set of eyes could help.

 

[Chorley8]

IMO, it's important to find these people associated with the ongoing investigation and hand them over to the proper authorities. Their connections might even be of more importance.

The US has an Extradition Treaty with Canada.


http://www.oas.org/juridico/mla/en/usa/index.html

On what charge? Unless you can prove that they had Amy which you can't from a photo. I remember on the film about Baxter and the charming Canadian tourist from wherever it was Baxter said that you could upload your own pictures of the girls and they would get 10%. This is later I know. But was this in place beforehand? It would be an easy method of uploading an image of Amy for any of the reasons previously given here by sleuthers.

The best way to treat Baxter and Zaglianitis is as friends (as much as that would hurt) and ask for their help.

Unless you could bring other charges in which case you might be able to get at knowledge they have of Amy.

Don't forget prostitution is legal in Holland and even parts of the U.S no need to demonize only Curacao.

Now one way into this would be if they are using any underage girls since both Canada and the U.S. will charge their own citizens involved in this. Again then you might get somewhere if they would cough up info on Amy to get a deal.

 

[Jersey*Girl]

Can someone please tell me how it was determined that person with the same name as the person of interest in this case is not the same person?

TIA

Hi there n/t! A FB is verified to be the same person in the LinkedIn & they aren't the Alister Douglas in Amy's case... Multiple pictures & everything. Plus the name isn't even spelled the same & it's not an alias.

 

[JaimeSommers]

Maybe I'm confused but I thought the sources of the photos were already determined and the FBI have located the individuals and they were questioned and denied any involvement with this case. My understanding is they did not know how the photos appeared on their website and the location where the photos were allegedly taken was checked out and does not exist.

So my question is why is the focus still on PB and AZ? Do we think they lied to the FBI? Would the FBI just take their word for it?

I agree with the poster who asked what our role is. It appears the FBI should be the ones following up on all these leads but they're not getting anywhere. Why? Surely they have much better intelligence devices than we do.

IMO, I think our focus should be on locating the suspects on the sketches. Perhaps that approach could lead us to the source.

The big big problem is:

These men are now in their 50's. The sketches are over 8 years old (?) Amy's sketch is also outdated.

There haven't been any Amy sightings in years. Why? Why were they so "visible" for a while and then it stopped? Did they finally achieve what they wanted out of Amy? Are her handlers dead or in prison? Did they hide Amy or kill her?

Last but not least, Y seems to be the most obvious person of interest in this case but yet for whatever reason, he's able to go on with an alleged inconclusive or passed polygraph even though he was the last one to have been seen with Amy.

I don't get it. Why aren't they pursuing him?

BBM ... The verified insider said many times that the last verified sighting shared with the public was in 2005. We cannot assume there have not been other sightings; in fact, the insider definitely alluded to post-2005 sightings, but said (IIRC) s/he couldn't share information about them because its an active federal investigation and to discuss them could sabotage the work of the FBI and place Amy in direct harm.

 

[Chorley8]

Amy is on Interpol site

http://www.interpol.int/Missing-Per...Eyes_Color=&IPSGT_Hair=&free=&missing_search=


I posted links to Interpol and the RCMP early on to see if any of the Wanted Persons matched any of the persons of interest in this case.

None that I could find but a new set of eyes could help.

Thanks and thank for your patience with everyone trying to catch up on the case. Interesting that Interpol says place of disappearance was Caribbean Sea United States. I don't usually think of Interpol as making simple errors but as I understand it this is not quite correct?