We used to have mods that followed threads to keep everybody in check, but I haven't seen any on this thread. From my understanding, we can discuss RF in that he has publicly spoke and been interviewed and was the last person to see Katie. However, until (if) he us named as a poi, we cannot "sleuth" him. We can't dig into his past and post it here. We cannot link his FB page (if he had one). We have to "discuss" him as he's part of the picture, but that's it.
During the Robert Mayer search, we got mod slapped more than a few times because his wife has a really interesting past that may/may not have anything to do with his disappearance. (For some interesting reading, start at thread 1. I think we got upwards of 20 threads on him)
If a mod comes along and I'm not correct on this, please set me straight! I'll pm Bessie and see if I can find out the exact rules.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Thanks for your pm, windstorm. I can promise you that mods still monitor the threads. Nothing has changed in that regard, but as always, it is impossible for mods to read each post in each thread. That's why we appreciate the cooperation of members like yourself, who either alert on problem posts, or send us pm's with your questions and concerns.
What you've said in the section of your post that I've bolded is correct, in general. And as another member pointed out (Joe Friday, I believe), a spouse or significant other almost always, by default, is considered a POI by LE
initially, especially when the missing/murdered victim was last known to be in the company of that individual. This type of situation comes up often in the cases we follow on WS, and the rules can vary somewhat from case to case depending on the circumstances.
Loved ones of victims react differently for a variety of reasons, such as fear, or an individual's own character and personality traits. It's important to keep in mind that part of being "victim friendly" means that we not judge too harshly, and always keep an open mind.
That said, occasionally, as in this case, when the circumstances vary from what a reasonable person would deem "normal", it's certainly acceptable to point that out. We should never outright accuse, however, but there's no problem with raising the question of why RF waited so many days to inform the family, or even to ponder how the the outcome might have differed had he alerted them sooner.
For example: "
I can't help but be suspicious of RF because of his failure to alert the family and neighbors. Could he have had a reason to believe he would protect Katie by remaining silent? Or did he really want to avoid upsetting her family, as he said?"
As opposed to:
"If my wife/husband/lover were missing, I'd be shouting it from the rooftops. There's no reason RF would fail to tell Katie's family she was missing unless he's the one who killed her."
That's just off the cuff, but the point is to keep an open mind, and give the loved one/family member the benefit of the doubt until, and unless, LE designates the individual a POI/suspect.
On the other hand, we don't get to the truth without asking the logical questions. That's what
sleuthing is all about. Just remember that the key is not so much in
what we say, but in
how we say it; and that we make sure what-we-say is based on (LE/MSM) reported facts, or what we can discern using our own intelligence, common sense and reliable resources. (SM is not a reliable resource).
(Get ready, here it comes.) For the umpteenth-and-a half time, leave the comments/gossip/rumors/tweets where you find them. When SM drama carries over into the threads it
ALWAYS leads to trouble, with posts being deleted, and members timed out or worse. More importantly, the facts become twisted, the truth is sullied, and very often innocent individuals are harmed. In this case, there is a decent chance that RF is innocent, and if so, imagine what unjustified accusations will do to him. Even if the actual perp is arrested, convicted, sentenced, and executed -- if rumors are allowed to thrive, there always will be people who will believe he's guilty. Who wants to live with that on her/his conscience, knowing s/he contributed to ruining a person's life? Certainly not I.
So there ya go. Thanks again for the pm and the questions, windstorm.
Here's hoping that truth and justice come swiftly for Katie Barham. May she rest in peace, and may the suffering of her family, friends, and precious children be eased by the memory of her love.