Pleading no contest to a criminal charge is similar to pleading guilty, but legally speaking, there are some significant differences that defendants should keep in mind.
Laws in almost every state allow for pleas of no contest, or nolo contendere in Latin, for certain types of cases. No contest means you’re conceding the charge without admitting guilt and without presenting a defense.
But unlike a plea of guilty or innocent, a defendant must get a court’s consent to plead no contest, which comes with certain legal consequences. Here are three things every defendant should understand:
Court discretion
.......
A judge must also make sure a defendant is knowingly and voluntarily pleading no contest. This means the defendant’s plea can’t be influenced by threats or promises, and she must fully understand the charges and legal consequences of pleading no contest.
.......
Legal advantages
By pleading no contest, a defendant can avoid going to trial on the criminal charge. This can be advantageous if a trial’s outcome is uncertain or if a defendant doesn’t want facts in the case to be aired out in public.
......
Legal disadvantages
Still, pleading no contest doesn’t mean a defendant is totally off the hook. Legally speaking, a no contest plea has the same effect as a guilty plea or a conviction when it comes to sentencing. So just because you’re pleading no contest and avoiding the hassle of a trial, don’t necessarily expect the judge to be lenient.
http://blogs.findlaw.com/blotter/2012/10/how-does-guilty-differ-from-no-contest.html