This is just my opinion but if JA doesn't qualify for the DP then WHO does qualify? The entire way from premeditating a brutal murder thru til now she was nothing other than the personification of cold, calculated, and evil. What she did in terms of premeditating TA's murder, the lengths she went in both doing that and in trying to cover herself after, the WAY that she brutally murdered a defenseless naked man three times over, the fact that she has NOT learned a thing from what she has done and to this day has absolutely NO remorse for what she has done and for all the lives that she has ruined (and continues to do her best to ruin), and the fact that she tried her best to manipulate and scheme the jury just shows what a cold-blooded monster that she truly is. If all of these factors proving that she is a monster added with the simple fact that the aggravators strongly outweighed the questionable, possibly non-existent mitigators wasn't enough for one or more juror(s) to issue the DP, then the logical conclusion one could come to is that such juror(s) were incapable of EVER issuing the DP. If they couldn't find JA eligible, then the fact is that they are/were never going to be able to find anyone eligible. Maybe he/she/they put too much faith in themselves during voir dire but when it came down to it, when the clock was striking midnight, they learned different. The unanimous decision today shows that no matter how qualified a convicted murderer may be in a trial, if there is/are one or more jurors that in the eleventh hour find out he/she/they morally/personally cannot bring themselves to issue the most appropriate DP decision then it delays -or even worse yet screws up- justice from being served, when it need not be so. Maybe what we can learn from this is is if you are ever called in on voir dire and are asked if you could give the DP if necessary, to make sure that you realize what your answer to that question MEANS and NOT naively answer it. If the unanimous decision came to be via any other possibility the only other situation that I can think of would be that one or more jurors didn't believe that JA met all of the criteria for/most deserved the DP. And if that is the case then I would have to ask if they were paying attention from guilty phase/verdict until now because I thought it was crystal clear that after seeing/hearing everything that was presented that JA most definitely qualified for and most deserved the DP as her appropriate punishment. This is just my opinion and how I see it, and others are entitled to feel different about it.