Oh man, I thought 1pm their time and I thought at least I could finally get some work done at work!
Seriously, I bet they dealt with the traffic coming in at 9 and decided 10 worked better for them,
Here's to hoping tomorrow is the day that Travis gets justice.
These jurors have been hanging out with each other for months, I'm not surprised they have groups that get along .. and JC maybe the juror was walking like that because she was annoyed at the MEDIA being there??
Special Relativity and all that!
I was the right age during the days of sex, drugs and rock and roll.
Talking dirty on the phone isn't new. Probably started as soon as the first people got phones.
And crotch shots? Playboy, Hustler, Penthouse, anyone? And *advertiser censored*'s as old as film.
So no, I don't think there's much I'm not familiar with.
View attachment 33522 Got this from Chris Hughes twitter. He snapped this outside the courthouse. It's too sweet, and still heartbreaking. I'm uploading this from tappatalk and Im not quite sure how it works, so please forgive me if I blow any margins.
Oh boy....NG has her blurred filter on. Split screen shots show HD picture left and right while her shot in the middle is softly "beautified" yuck!
Popping in and out, signed up for alerts so if I am at work I can take lunch and go to my car and listen in.
At first it was disappointing to realize another day was/has gone by without a verdict, but I agree with Karmaclaw, this verdict/decision could have an impact on whether a person lives or dies, no matter what kind of evil they are. Most humans don't blindly make that decision and its hard to believe there isn't a 'reason' why a person would commit murder. I truly believe once the emotional part of the deliberations are over, the common sense, evidence part will take over. This jury had some very logical questions. They were interested in have some parts explained. They seem to have common sense. While the waiting is difficult, I still have 100% faith in them.
K
I'm wondering why there has to be a disagreement going on in the jury room. There are over 600 pieces of evidence. Because it's a death penalty case, I would want to go through evidence that validates my decision, and what it is the defense is saying that makes my decision invalid.
Maybe, they all agreed on the first vote, but want to be able to answer to it in their own consciences later on. I really don't want them to rush through, and not be able to live with themselves later on. What a huge responsibility it is to hold someone's life in your hands. :twocents:
No matter how anxious we are JA is on a wild ride. Her arrogance will convince her she will not get Murder 1. Her dreams will convince her otherwise. Well worth the wait if JA is suffering greatly.
I agree Scarlett, it took us three days to send somebody to jail for just 3 years and I was the jury foreperson. The evidence was clear to all but two of the jurors, one man and one woman who were the kind of people who were very poor at making decisions.....ANY decision...so we just carefully led them both through all the aspects of the evidence until they were comfortable enough to make their mind up. Even then you could see their discomfort in forming the word "Guilty". If we all alike, life sure would be boring.
Edit: Please don't misunderstand, I know what you mean about being really sure but some people need more than that.:blushing:
JC is on Nancy right now, mimicking the "defiant" juror. :facepalm: This woman drives me nuts.
My dearest peeps, I am not one bit worried about this jury.
As many of you have pointed out in detail (because that's how you Sleuthers roll), the jurors do NOT know all the info we do.
Moreover, the jurors have not had the luxury of playing and replaying each day's evidence, not only at the end of the day, but even weeks after testimony was given. They have the evidence, and they have their notes.
.
LOL@ Jean C.
Is she jealous of Beth or something?
I agree, all you need is a DL for jury duty.Since I have served as a juror I have come to the conclusion that a simple IQ test and simple question test should be given potential jurors during the selection process. I think they should have to be qualified to serve on a jury, period. I've seen jurors who I thought had smoked entirely too much MJ over the years and I've seen some who had absolutely no clue why they were on a jury. Some of them just had this blank look on their faces and couldn't recall even the most obviously simple evidence shown during the examinations. Some want to try the case in the juror room only they make up the evidence in their own minds. Some of them don't understand any of the instructions at all. Some of them can't even read the instructions. Think about it, these jurors are deciding actual life and death cases. Scarey.
Why,What is she doing-TIA
Why on God's green earth would TA make reference to a 12 year old IF he had just been found out by JA and, according to her, hated himself for it??
Because there was no pedophilia. AT ALL.