Steve4Justice
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2011
- Messages
- 31
- Reaction score
- 0
I have to say, Juror # 3's interview bothers me so much, I can't stop thinking about it. The conclusion I have to come to is that this jury needed (and apparently expected) a video of ICA committing the murder in order to convict.
And no, according to # 3, lesser charges were not considered. All she talked about was that there was not enough evidence for her to give someone the death penalty. If she did she said, that would make her a murderer too.
Here is a link to Juror # 3's interview.....if you have the stomach to watch.
The video is under that article about what she said.
http://www.gossipcop.com/jennifer-f...ghtline-interview-video-youtube-watch-july-6/
It's absolutly sickening what she had to say. First of all they could have voted for LWOP and not the death penalty so apparently she is misinformed about that and also she shouldn't be thinking about sentencing when considering the guilt phase. Also, what about voting for manslaughter. She seems to be saying that wasn't an option. Didn't she read the jury instructions. It's making me more sick reading what she had to say.:banghead: