Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Drowning is unbelievable in this case, because there was ZERO evidence of it! The duct tape was stuck around her hair to her HAIR. This meant that whoever put that tape on her--while she was alive--had no intention of it ever being removed. Hence, murder. Sheesh. Talk about lack of critical thinking skills in this jury. I am really struggling to be polite, but I am ready to blow a gasket, here. :banghead: :banghead:
Travesty of justice. Ignorance and murder won today.
:twocents: She will become Casey 7.0 and so on... Casey Anthony is a very real danger to many.
Just another thought...so, I am bringing it over from another thread:
Maybe the jury wasn't stupid...maybe they decided it was cheaper just to let her walk free. Maybe they figured that true justice could only come when she is left to her own devices and that of this wretched Anthony clan. That is the only positive thought I've had since 2:18 PM. I wonder if GA still has his gun?
I seriously want to know your thoughts. Do you believe there wasn't enough evidence to find her responsible on some level for Caylee's death? What would you need? The state isn't required to prove motive or COD so what other evidence would you need? I think that is what angers and confuses people about this decision. If you truly follow the law and base your opinion on the evidence then how does an alternate say he believes something there was no evidence of? I want to understand because I'm truly at a loss.
Thank you for using the law and not emotion.
Thank your your due diligence in examining all the evidence. Thank you for taking the time to review the audio and video tapes provided to you. Thank you for giving that extra time when we all knew you just wanted to go back home. Thank you for the courage to address the world to explain how you arrived at your decision. And finally, thank you for opening your homes, wallets and checkbooks to Casey so she can continue on her quest for that "Bella Vita".
/sarcasm
Thank you for asking however I don't think this is the place or time. Too much raw emotion and I respect that.
I know there are others here that agree with me so I may start a thread just for that. Maybe if others post their feelings some of you will understand where the jury came from.
Many of you have worked very hard on this case for 3 years. I may go back and read the documents and try and understand why many of you feel she is guilty. I just didn't see that presented to me.
I will tell you that part of it for me was George ...although Cindy lied on the stand and it was proven I didn't believe anything he said.
I am not a scientist :innocent: but the "experts" crossed each other out. Oh gosh there is so much more. I did watch the trial from start to end just to see what I would decide.
I tried to hate her, I tried to see it from the Pro's side however it was not proven to me at all.
Nobody in their right mind would let an accidental drowning turn into a murder case, they would have said a LONG time ago "wait, im sorry, this is what happened". Especially facing the death penalty!!!! it is just not sensical in any way or form
You know once they get home they are going to research this case, and websleuths is one of the first sites to come back in the results. What do you personally want to say to them, ask them, or want them to know in light of their decision?
I have read several 100 comments here and there are three or four people who think the jury acted responsibly.
Sometimes one expert theory trumps the other. in this case logic was there but was totally ignored.