Whisperer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2008
- Messages
- 17,542
- Reaction score
- 65
The only way they can tell a phoney story is to put ICA on the stand. Heck, I can't even see them claiming abuse w/o a psychiatrist who examined her and she told them that. It doesn't mean it is true. They can't go there in the Guilt Phase of the trial at all. ..hmm, so maybe the State will put on their case and JB will attack, and attack and object till the cows come home.
Maybe...the only defense witness JB will put on is ICA...wouldn't that be a hoot? She gets convicted and then they do their magic...or so they think.
Mark Geragos had tons of witnesses to speak well of SP in the Penalty Phase. It didn't do any good. The aggravating factors outweighed the mitigating and the same will happen with ICA or it should if the jurors get through that d#$n 'reasonable doubt' hurdle.
Maybe...the only defense witness JB will put on is ICA...wouldn't that be a hoot? She gets convicted and then they do their magic...or so they think.
Mark Geragos had tons of witnesses to speak well of SP in the Penalty Phase. It didn't do any good. The aggravating factors outweighed the mitigating and the same will happen with ICA or it should if the jurors get through that d#$n 'reasonable doubt' hurdle.