Im not sure it appears that well planned out. However, it seems very likely the killer(s) were there before.
I think we’re going to need some more info before we’re in agreement. We see it differently right now, but we’re both dealing with a lot of unknowns to get from A to B. I too reserve the right to change my mind.Thank you.
Nothing was taken afaik other than Jayme. Her parents would have stood in the way of this person taking her so they were quickly eliminated (seemingly). afaik there is no relations or history with criminal activity by either parent. I'm not hearing about enemies, personal debts, drugs, or anything else. The theory I'm pretty stuck on equals the motive being taking Jayme since she was taken alive after her parents were murdered. jmo. This crime strikes me as up close and personal.
I reserve the right to change my mind at anytime.
This is curious. How is it that someone psycho enough to kill 2 people in cold blood, and kidnap their child... but then grows a conscience and "can't" kill her? If that's the case, they could just let her go and drive away. This killer/kidnapper with a heart is a new one to me. Has that ever happened before?
Ive often wondered if they took her to throw cops off to make it look like its something its not. One of the biggest immediate and popular speculations was that she met someone online. Seems like a common possibility, it has happened in past cases, so if LE spent time on that scenario, or sex trafficking, or whatever, then they had time to regain composure and mix right back into routine. Im not totally sold on this theory, but its something Ive considered.
Very possible, since they had to flee. Unfortunately, they might think of her as a liability after getting away...if that were the case.
But these sick and evil people do exactly that- they aren’t concerned about risk. They are brazen. JMO
If taking Jayme wasn't the intent then the only way I see her leaving alive was if there was a woman present who just couldn't bear to kill a child or see one killed.
This is exactly what I think. IMO, they could know exactly who drives them. But, when it comes time to prosecute a defense attorney will be unable to say investigators had tunnel vision and never looked at other cars of the same make and model, IMOO. Just speculation This is what I desperately hope.
But when they do that they go after babies or toddlers not 13 year olds. The part about nothing left to lose might be a good possibility.
I agree typical it is a infant, but what if they had lost a child that was near her age, maybe even near her appearance.
Or, Jayme scratched the perp and would have DNA under her nails, or the perp left DNA on Jayme via some other unspeakable act, or any other reason why the perp had to take her away from the crime scene that was about to get taken over by investigators. She couldn’t be left there, dead or alive. And we don’t know if she was taken dead or alive.
