ilovechili
Where is the wiKKed witch? Will Oct. bring her?
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2018
- Messages
- 4,388
- Reaction score
- 32,456
The only reason the police publicly ruled him out was because he went into the home afterwards.
It is only logical behind the public's eye they have been able to rule many out.
Rarely if ever does LE come out and announce it when they have ruled others out even when they have..
This was an exception due to the circumstances. He didnt want the community to think they had evidence showing this pervert was the murderer and the one who had taken Jayme.
As far as who work or worked at JO in three months that is more than ample time to interview everyone the investigators felt should be interviewed.
If they had found any connection at JO... Fitzgerald certainly would have evidence of some kind even if it was strong CE which can be even more powerful than direct evidence. Imo the JO possible connection turned up nothing that would help them solve this case.
Yet at almost the three month mark according to him they have found no evidence showing them who the suspect happens to be.
I believe him when he says he has no evidence to show him who did this and that would include JO workers both past and present. Imo
He is still wanting tips and needing them in order for him to solve this case.
He wants this monster off of the street as much as the family members do.
Imo
BBM. Very good points and I agree about 100 percent. I simply disagree they would necessarily tell us anything. Whether it was someone at the plant, whether it was a stranger, etc. No one at Jennie-O has been dismissed. Nor has anyone from Timbuktu or the moon. Or the local area.
In past posts on other threads, I saw people say things like if someone had a lot to drink we would know it by now (even a month ago) because toxicology is back by now. No, we would not. It would not necessarily be shared, pretty much nothing is shared, for good reason probably which you state as well. Or if it was someone at the plant, or a friend, we would know that by now, as if they would tell us. It is not their obligation to tell the public. Which I am pretty sure you would agree with. Until they have enough.
I think there are a lot of semantics. Yes he can say they do not know who did it because until an arrest, and a totally ironclad case, or at least enough to arrest, in generalisms, they don't know who did it. He has said no one is excluded. Except the PT.
And that leaves everything open which could mean they know more than we do or they do not.
No offense intended, I agree on your very same points but I disagree that it means anyone at the plant has been excluded. Or anyone else as well.