Because some are thinking maybe they came in to money and someone knew they did so robbery gone wrong I guess? This example was used but in fact it was money owed, not what they received.
It was reported in an early article that Denise Closs’ dad said Denise and Jayme attended a family function (birthday party) during the day Sunday, and that James was not in attendance because he had to work. Hence, one speculation is that he worked an evening shift (or even a 2nd job?) from which he would have arrived home around the time this all happened.
Huh? Full satisfaction means the debt was paid in full. OP thought maybe they recently came into money to pay off the debt but 7 years ago is hardly recent.
I see. Thank you.
Not allowed to quote
Yeah, it seems to me that if valuables were taken from the house LE would have disclosed it and it would point to a robbery that went south. So what's left is: Who was the target? Jayme? The parents? Why not shoot Jayme? Clearly it's not a hostage situation given the time elapsed. IOW Jayme as a hostage wouldn't give them any leverage at this point.
Both Jayme and 46-year-old Denise Closs were described as quiet, kind, religious and giving, an example of how a loving mom raised her daughter with her own good values. “They were just two peas in a pod,” family friend MS tells PEOPLE, describing the pair as “almost inseparable” and saying Denise “was pretty quiet and shy like Jayme — they were similar.”
It was indeed erroneously reported early on that the family get together was in the victims’ home; that was later corrected (it was not).
