Maybe one of our lawyers can answer some of this for us, but it looks to me as if the initial appeal has been filed, and the state has countered with a couple requests for summary judgement (probably not the right term, but I'm not a lawyer/chemist either!). This last request for extension of time was by FCA for her 'record', the earlier one was for the state's records, if I'm reading this correctly. Maybe that note added to the last court's extension of time is saying that the court transcripts are now available and they're warning that another extension won't be granted without proof from the court reporter that something isn't available? I'm hoping they're saying it's time to play ball or leave the field, maybe?
Today there is now a new line dated 11/1 saying FCA has responded to the last request by the state for judgement , and now we wait to hear the court's ruling on that response.
I suspect this is all just a way for the DT to draw all this out so FCA can claim a basis for the 5th amendment claim in the civil suits, but if so I wonder how long they can keep this going, and also whether she can appeal this decision to the FL Supreme Court, assuming she loses this one.