INsession is still covering. Showing "highlights"
Jose talking about the "false positives". Jose kept on badgering on the idea that Forgey had not logged the false positives but to me Forgey kept on saying, "that's not where I put them" and "you didn't ask me about that you asked about 2008"
so, Jose and his tricks. I have to agree with faefrost in saying Jose plays to a jury(and even then his tricks might work only a little)and not the judge. I am sorry to say this but one would have to think the Judge a fool...and this judge has proved to me he is no fool. I don't have the experience to express what I wish to exactly here...but how Jose argues the very foundation of what it is he is arguing(upon inspection by the judge)cannot be acceptable.
Meaning, the judge would almost have to allow it in to see how it fits into the trial. Gee, makes no sense. Someone else will say it better...