2011.06.16 TRIAL Day Twenty (Morning Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,321
*raises hand and waves it frantically*

May I be excused, please? PLEASE?!
 
  • #1,322
By now, none of us knows what item they are speaking of...

Oh, ok it's the duct tape.
 
  • #1,323
So the expert says that ICA was excluded from the tests on the duct tape

Caylee was also excluded

I cannot wait until JA gets up there
 
  • #1,324
Yep,if you watched Phil Spectors trial ,this is exactly what Linda Kenny-Baden did. Mass confusion and a whole lotta nothin'
 
  • #1,325
I wish JB had the bee pen from Picture Pages. That might make his scribbles more interesting.

:bee:
 
  • #1,326
Raise hands. Haha. HAHA! Whew.
 
  • #1,327
I think Mr. Baez is trying to induce a hypnagogic trance state in the jurors so he can plant some kind of pro-defense suggestion. I know I'm close to nodding off...
 
  • #1,328
Obviously someone, in a past hearing, was able to put together a powerpoint presentation to be put on the overhead...why oh why, did JB not do a sheet for the overhead to see this info...

Also, this is so overloading the jury with unneeded info just to say that an FBI analyst left DNA on the tape. *my eyes are now rolling around loose in my head!"
That's the point, IMO.
 
  • #1,329
:bang::desert::coffeews::waiting::scream::snail:
 
  • #1,330
Oh boy. Just wait until he gets a chemist up there.
 
  • #1,331
Ohhhhhhh - ICA excluded...Caylee excluded from DNA profile. BB's DNA was submitted, right? so could not have been his.....

ALSO George excluded.
 
  • #1,332
  • #1,333
This witness is a Marilu Henner lookalike...
 
  • #1,334
So Georges DNA not on duct tape either... thats what I just learned.
 
  • #1,335
Keep in mind the defense doesn't have to prove anything. They just have to create reasonable doubt...JMHO.

I have to restart puter, thanks for all the posts! I'll be back.
 
  • #1,336
Get to the point!!! Arrrggggghhhhh

I think JB wants to prove that the big meanies with the State have hidden irrelevant evidence from the jury. :D
 
  • #1,337
ok, they are too close to those sharpies....the smell is killing me......
 
  • #1,338
So GA was excluded, too.

Good job JB
 
  • #1,339
  • #1,340


Seubert up @ white paper illustrating to jury w/hand drawn graph......(wouldn't this have been easier to put on the overhead? MO)

D3s1358 chromosome #3....house phone number.....
looking
go down the line.....name each category....@ the very end she is actually look to see if peaks present and then evaluate results

these are dnr repeats present @ each of the locations....one from mother and one from father....if parents have the same STR type you are going to have just the one peak..... when you have dna profile @ one location...don't have all 13 to get a result...only listed out 9 here....second test lists out others....depend on marker is how discriminatory = that is a different part of the process.....relating to ducttape on non-sticky side? in report .....list profile here ....fall below....write it out here? that is fine.....


how markers to exclude someone? could just take 1 to exclude an individual....kc was excluded....from this particular item(duct tape) both Caylee excluded as well...further to determine partial profile....use all known blood samples submitted from Kc, Caylee, and CA and LA and GA...compared profiles those to this dna profile...all individuals were excluded from this profile.....Seubert back to witness stand



 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
111
Guests online
1,489
Total visitors
1,600

Forum statistics

Threads
632,359
Messages
18,625,273
Members
243,110
Latest member
dt0473
Back
Top