Aruba - Natalee Holloway, 18, Oranjestad, 30 May 2005 *AL extortion trial* *Guilty* #3

  • #441
Natalee Holloway
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) — Court records filed Friday indicate Joran van der Sloot, the chief suspect in Natalee Holloway’s 2005 disappearance, intends to plead guilty in a federal case accusing him of trying to extort money from the missing teen’s mother.

A federal judge set an Oct. 18 plea and sentencing hearing for van der Sloot in Birmingham, Alabama. He had previously entered a plea of not guilty in the case
 
  • #442
They sure are keeping a tight wrap 0n the details. Will there be any victims' statements?
 
  • #443
  • #444
Wow. Also here,


Joran van der Sloot is expected to plead guilty to his involvement in an extortion plot connected to Natalee Holloway's disappearance, and her family's lawyer said the deal will require him to reveal how the Alabama teen died.

“It [the plea agreement] was conditioned upon Mr. van der Sloot revealing details of how Natalee died and how her body was disposed of,” family lawyer John Q. Kelly told NBC News on Sunday.

A lawyer for the van der Sloot nor federal prosecutors could be immediately reached for comment on Monday.
 
  • #445

“It [the plea agreement] was conditioned upon Mr. van der Sloot revealing details of how Natalee died and how her body was disposed of,” family lawyer John Q. Kelly told NBC News on Sunday.
I was just going to post a similar link. I tend not to believe it. We'll see in 2 days but I'm betting it was a kind of desperation shot over the bow from Kelly.

Surprised we haven't heard from GVS recently. She had been more than hinting at revelations to come. Upper thread postings.
 
  • #446
Wow. Also here,


Joran van der Sloot is expected to plead guilty to his involvement in an extortion plot connected to Natalee Holloway's disappearance, and her family's lawyer said the deal will require him to reveal how the Alabama teen died.

“It [the plea agreement] was conditioned upon Mr. van der Sloot revealing details of how Natalee died and how her body was disposed of,” family lawyer John Q. Kelly told NBC News on Sunday.

A lawyer for the van der Sloot nor federal prosecutors could be immediately reached for comment on Monday.
It doesn't make sense the way Kelly spells it out as a confession. He's already given >a handful of versions. So far it's not a crime, if he did do it, that would trump Dutch jurisdiction. It would be silly for him to do anything but say he was lying. Will be interesting anyway.
 
  • #447
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #448

van der sloot courttv.png




nancy grace joran.png


 
  • #449

View attachment 453745



View attachment 453746

Lol NG.
 
  • #450
  • #451
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #452
  • #453

View attachment 453761


That's Kelly's first version.

Now he reported that BH will hold a presser and SHE will disclose what vds told the FBI upon reaching the USA. Aint no way vds is going to reveal "new circumstances" about NH. It's not even part of what he's been charged with. No PD would allow him to incriminate himself in an unrelated crime.


Jvds don't care. He'll be on a plane before nov 1. Or by the weekend.
Only question remaining (to me) is whether predictable future crimes in Peru will be served before he would be scheduled to start serving time in the usa.
Imo
 
Last edited:
  • #454
Van der Sloot has lied so much over the years about what happened to Natalee. Why believe him now? Unless there are witnesses to the crime, how do we know he’s telling the truth? He could probably pass a lie detector test, too, if he was given one. JMO
 
  • #455
Van der Sloot has lied so much over the years about what happened to Natalee. Why believe him now? Unless there are witnesses to the crime, how do we know he’s telling the truth? He could probably pass a lie detector test, too, if he was given one. JMO
I agree with you, not only is he unbelievable now, but there is no incentive to tell the truth. No way a plea deal for financial crimes was tied to previously undisclosed details in an unsolved disappearance in a foreign country for which he is not a suspect under that foreigh government's law.

Imo
 
Last edited:
  • #456
Looks like he's been fed well in prison
 
  • #457
Van der Sloot has lied so much over the years about what happened to Natalee. Why believe him now? Unless there are witnesses to the crime, how do we know he’s telling the truth? He could probably pass a lie detector test, too, if he was given one. JMO
Agree totally. But I think there may be some comfort or closure perhaps for Natalie's family to hear him admit that he killed her, even if they never find her remains.
 
  • #458
Agree totally. But I think there may be some comfort or closure perhaps for Natalie's family to hear him admit that he killed her, even if they never find her remains.
I don't think he killed her, I think she probably died while he was there. But that's nothing to rehash now.

Too much water under the bridge now, and legally it's an unrelated disappearance. The prosecutor saw enough to accept a guilty plea for fraud. Earlier a polygraph was mentioned; It makes sense if he did pass one, because he clearly did lie about putting her body beneath a foundation of a house which hadn't been built yet.

He has the same right to competent defense as do any of us. My main point is that they would never let him incriminate himself in a crime that was never proven to ever happen. Nor would the prosecutor or judge allow it.

Imo
 
  • #459
I don't think he killed her, I think she probably died while he was there. But that's nothing to rehash now.

Too much water under the bridge now, and legally it's an unrelated disappearance. The prosecutor saw enough to accept a guilty plea for fraud. Earlier a polygraph was mentioned; It makes sense if he did pass one, because he clearly did lie about putting her body beneath a foundation of a house which hadn't been built yet.

He has the same right to competent defense as do any of us. My main point is that they would never let him incriminate himself in a crime that was never proven to ever happen. Nor would the prosecutor or judge allow it.

Imo
He is free to do whatever he wants to do. Defendants do admit to crimes they have not been charged with. Usually with some sort of immunity agreement. But usually such an admission must be verifiable in some way.
 
  • #460
Wow. Also here,


Joran van der Sloot is expected to plead guilty to his involvement in an extortion plot connected to Natalee Holloway's disappearance, and her family's lawyer said the deal will require him to reveal how the Alabama teen died.

“It [the plea agreement] was conditioned upon Mr. van der Sloot revealing details of how Natalee died and how her body was disposed of,” family lawyer John Q. Kelly told NBC News on Sunday.

A lawyer for the van der Sloot nor federal prosecutors could be immediately reached for comment on Monday.
If this is really the case, JVDS to provide details of how Natalee met her death, then this is not a done deal! IMO, JVDS lives to be manipulative and most likely won't be truthful, ever.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
142
Guests online
2,223
Total visitors
2,365

Forum statistics

Threads
632,496
Messages
18,627,594
Members
243,169
Latest member
parttimehero
Back
Top