Plenty of women have traumatic or somewhat traumatic births. That's nature. It's place in a murder trial confuses me.
Agree. Its not that uncommon. I have several friends and family members who've had traumatic births. One thing they have in common is seeking a different form of prenatal care for future babies. For a couple it changed how they perceive relationships with medical professionals, but at no time did any of them check out of hospital against medical advice, and none went on to kill any relatives, accidentally or otherwise. None lost their job or stopped working (other than the usual mat leave, of course), or became estranged from relatives. I don't see it as a relevant excuse for anything, really. 'Erin can't cope with the things life throws at many people' doesn't mean anything with regard to the poisonings, imo.
Erin isn't exactly obese.
I don't know that I believe she was gearing toward an actual gastric bypass but what does ring true -- her having one, then blaming weight loss on a new cancer, stalling any divorce.
I mean this is someone with four family members she at least purported to care about in the throes of organ failure and death, and she says, you don't know the trouble this has caused me, what with information only trickling in. Her situation is, oh, soooooooo much worse than the four who are dying.
That is one expansive ego.
JMO
Erin would definitely be medically obese. People are often surprised by how 'small' obese medically speaking actually is. I know a couple of people who've had weight loss surgery at her size.
I think it's to appeal to the jurors by mentioning things that most adults have experienced to some degree - oh, she's self conscious about her weight; she's struggled with self-esteem; she wanted to study to pursue a career!
Except... most people who go through these very same things don't allegedly murder three people in an (allegedly) deliberate poisoning method.
Yeah I agree. Nothing she's said is that unusual. By the time you get to 50ish, most people have gone through stuff. Nothing she's said so far would make me think 'oohhhhh so this is why she accidentally poisoned a bunch of people, understandable'. For me its more like,
so you're an adult person who's had adult stuff happen. Okay, and? But that's just me, maybe the jury is more sympathetic. I'm super curious where they're going with this tbh.
My thoughts on this move by the defence is the exact opposite to this...
To me this is a sign of a defence team that is very confident their client will be acquitted of the charges.
I think they probably told her not to. But, just as she thought she knew better than medical professionals on more than one occasion, she's doing it anyway because Erin knows best and Erin controls the narrative. And ultimately just like her plea, it is all her choice, not theirs. JMO.
Interesting. Will have to wait and see more for that to eventuate. I'm a layperson after all but I'm not so sure she'll be acquitted.
I hope they keep manslaughter on the table. Especially involuntary manslaughter: "Involuntary manslaughter is an unlawful killing without intent.... For a court to find a person guilty of involuntary manslaughter, the prosecution must prove that the death was the result of an illegal act, omission or an act of neglect,
or a failure to take reasonable care." IMO that would be pretty trivial to prove compared to murder, where the intent can be a lot more nebulous to prove beyond reasonable doubt.