Very like a big fat spiderBingo!!! That's why Death Cap mushrooms were her perfect alleged weapon of choice. Food that she believed couldn't be detected, yet she controlled and lured her victims into coming over and eating.

Very like a big fat spiderBingo!!! That's why Death Cap mushrooms were her perfect alleged weapon of choice. Food that she believed couldn't be detected, yet she controlled and lured her victims into coming over and eating.
Would the jurors really believe EP's version of events over the sole survivor?I read somewhere once that if the accused says absolutely nothing except "I don't know", "I don't remember" and "I wasn't there", then it will be very hard to find them guilty.
I find the accused's behaviour with the prosecutor so fascinating. She would have always thought she was the most intelligent in the room, and now she is up against an intellectual heavyweight in Dr Rogers. I think a lot of her behaviour in the courtroom (asking Dr Rogers to repeat a question, pointing out double negatives) is geared to controlling the narrative, and also trying to gain an upperhand in her responses. I agree with so many here who have said that she comes across as arrogant, but I also think she is incredibly controlling. I don't believe for a second any of the claims she has made about Simon, and in fact, do think it was Erin who dictated the terms of their relationship. IMOShe said she needs to be able to lip read when she is listening to people speak, so her staring intently is one of the few things that there is definitely an innocent explanation for in this case.
Over the kindly, widowed pastor? I hope not!!!Would the jurors really believe EP's version of events over the sole survivor?
Would the jurors really believe EP's version of events over the sole survivor?
It’s not just Ian who mentions the gray plates. One of the women - I think Gail? - also talked about it.I know that sounds like a logical approach but it will be a very difficult deliberation for the jury, i think.
For example, Ian said the guests meals were served on 4 grey plates.
Erin said she doesn't own 4 grey plates.
Ian is most probably telling the truth - that he thinks the guest's meals were served on 4 grey plates....but that doesn't mean the meals were actually served on 4 grey plates.
The fact that someone thinks one thing happened and another person thinks a different thing happened, doesn't mean someone must be lying. They both may be telling the truth.
From the evidence, maybe it can't be proven that Erin ate from a different plate to everyone else.
The judge won't allow the jury to assume Erin is lying about some things, simply because she has admittedly lied about other things.
In fact the judge won't allow the jury to assume anything.
JMO
Yes, i think it was Heather, Ian's wife.It’s not just Ian who mentions the gray plates. One of the women - I think Gail? - also talked about it.
Thanks for posting this. I noticed the second to last sentence, under the “Disposition” subheading:I was reading the Austin Clinic's guidelines for treating Death Cap poisoning. Just going to put it here, for anyone who is interested.
They really needed the knowledge to jump on the treatments right away, because in 1-7 days a victim could be dead.
View attachment 592714
Agreed. But I don't believe for a second she used a plate that was made or 'decorated' by her daughter for a 'very special lunch'. All of those types of novelty crockery decorated by kids is only ever used for Sunday night chips and nuggets in front of the TV- there is no way Erin would have brought that specific plate out for a fancy Saturday lunch where she had outlaid $$$. But as mentioned, no way to prove that.Yes, i think it was Heather, Ian's wife.
But Erin's son who cleaned up, said they were white plates.
I think the matter of plates will be a very difficult piece of the puzzle to prove, for the jury. I doubt they'll be able to, from the evidence.
Actually... it might be exactly for this situation that she'd pull a plate like that out. If anyone questioned her, she'd say, with her concern for the children with her pending Stage 4 nonsense, she just wanted to be able to remember the children, because you know her time might be limited (and not because she needed to remember which BW was hers).Agreed. But I don't believe for a second she used a plate that was made or 'decorated' by her daughter for a 'very special lunch'. All of those types of novelty crockery decorated by kids is only ever used for Sunday night chips and nuggets in front of the TV- there is no way Erin would have brought that specific plate out for a fancy Saturday lunch where she had outlaid $$$. But as mentioned, no way to prove that.
Yes, i think that was the evidence from Ian and also Simon's second hand evidence.White or gray, there was a difference in color between these plates and Erin’s plate.
I definitely thought it was a bit of a power move when Erin asked for Dr Rogers to adjust her microphone!I find the accused's behaviour with the prosecutor so fascinating. She would have always thought she was the most intelligent in the room, and now she is up against an intellectual heavyweight in Dr Rogers. I think a lot of her behaviour in the courtroom (asking Dr Rogers to repeat a question, pointing out double negatives) is geared to controlling the narrative, and also trying to gain an upperhand in her responses. I agree with so many here who have said that she comes across as arrogant, but I also think she is incredibly controlling. I don't believe for a second any of the claims she has made about Simon, and in fact, do think it was Erin who dictated the terms of their relationship. IMO
If Simon was such a 'deadbeat' or abusive, the defence would have gone to great lengths to show evidence of this. And of course, there has been nothing of the sort presented. I hope the prosecution will display the aggressive texts sent to Simon's parents, which would further demonstrate the 'two faces' of the accused.
MOO but I think some people present themselves as having a healthy ego to hide their underlying low self-esteem.She says that she has self-esteem issues, which could be right, but she appears to have a healthy ego...
Did son clear dessert plates … or dinner plates? He thinks dinner, but would he know which plates are dinner and which are commonly called salad/desert/side plates? 15cm is not a dinner plate, is way too small.Yes, i think that was the evidence from Ian and also Simon's second hand evidence.
Erin’s son...
“I collected all the plates. I collected all the glasses, put them next to the sink. They were white plates that were 15 centimetres in diameter, they were raised on the edge. Slightly curved up,” he said. “Dinner plates
Erin
“Just the dinner plates I had, a couple of black ones, a couple of white ones, one that's red on top and black underneath and a plate I've got that [child] made at kindergarten,” said Erin
Ian
“Yes, there were four large, grey dinner plates and one smaller plate, a different colour. It was an orangey-tan sort of colour,” said Mr Wilkinson
I guess my point is, it's probably a very difficult piece of evidence to use, in order to show intent, since you would need to assume various factors, which the jury won't be allowed to do. They can 'infer' certain things, but i doubt they will be able to here.
Maybe this evidence won't matter for the jury, who knows.
JMO