Erin is discussing her weight, we’re chiming in as is our rightSomeone's weight should not be relevant, nor discussed. IMO
Food and cooking is a fairly important part of her case here
Last edited:
Erin is discussing her weight, we’re chiming in as is our rightSomeone's weight should not be relevant, nor discussed. IMO
Just my opinion, but it’s occurred to me that, despite their separation, Erin wanted them to still operate their lives as a married couple. … just not live together.5m ago02.56 BST
Erin Patterson recalls first conflict about money with estranged husband Simon
Barrister Colin Mandy SC then asks Patterson about messages between her and Simon in November 2022.
In the messages, previously shown to the court, Patterson tells Simon she has applied for child support payments.
The court previously heard that when Patterson sent Simon an an anaesthetist fee for their son the same month, he said said he had been advised by the government department overseeing child support payments not to provide money for things like that.
“I understood what he was trying to communicate but I didn’t think what he was saying was right,” Patterson says.
She recalls how she was feeling.
I was hurt.
We’d never had a conflict with money that I could remember before that.
![]()
Australia mushroom trial live: Erin Patterson ‘regrets’ telling Facebook friends she was ‘sick of’ parents-in-law Gail and Don, court hears
Victorian woman, 50, has pleaded not guilty to three charges of murder and one of attempted murder over a fatal 2023 beef wellington lunch. Follow livewww.theguardian.com
I don’t profess to be an expert in the matter, however she’s possibly lucky that SP accepted the suggested 50/50 division of their assets. .. I wonder if that agreement has been legally documented/ signed off on
Right---they 'smelled funny' according to her earlier statement. So she didn't use them in the pasta recipe she purchased them for.45 minutes ago - 04:28 PMMax Corstorphan
‘Pungent’ mushrooms from Asian grocer put in container and left in cupboard ahead of fatal lunch
Ahead of the fatal lunch that Ms Patterson accepts included death cap mushrooms, the accused told the court that she had purchased some “pungent” mushrooms from an Asian grocer in Melbourne that she had intended to use in another meal.
“I was going to use them the day I bought them, but they were very pungent,” she said.
She told the court she decided not to use them that day, instead putting them in a container that she placed in the cupboard of her Leongatha home.
Ms Patterson went on to confirm that those “pungent” mushrooms ended up in the cupboard alongside other dehydrated mushrooms ahead of the fatal lunch.
She said she would add mushrooms that she had dehydrated into containers she “already had going” with other dehydrated mushrooms.
I’m just going to get real with you guys; if I purchased mushrooms and I got them out to cook them and they smelled so pungent that I didn’t feel comfortable putting them in a pasta dish, I would throw them out.
I wouldn’t store them. I wouldn’t put them back in a container. I wouldn’t put them in the pantry, I would throw them in the bin.
I also don’t forage. I was always taught not to touch wild mushrooms and not to eat them. I’m sensible like that.
I’m also going to say that one of the worst decisions Ms Patterson has made during this trial is to take the stand. All my opinion only.
How can anyone ever find poor Erin to blame if no one can know which mushrooms were the toxic ones? I guess we have to let her walk?
It’s not really a challenging/ traumatising life story at all IMOI’m not sure about that. Erin’s ‘challenging / traumatising’ life story would resonate with some people, and IMO she is banking on having at least one such person still on the Jury panel after the final ballot.
Stating this again, since it's come up a few times today from a few different posters: there is no safe minimum amount of death caps, and you cannot build up an immunity to them. It is not that kind of toxin.… and she’s built up a tolerance to death caps? Sowing seeds of doubt?
Tho having difficulty picturing a person sauté-ing one mushroom and tasting a small bite and then waiting to get sick. especially a person who worries about cancer & illness all the time
I think it was awful that she lied to the Doctors and the Public Health Official, and denied she had foraged any mushrooms. It was cruel and may have cost her loved ones their lives. She could have told the hospital about that immediately but she lied and lied some more.So far nothing I have heard makes me think she is an awful person. It just makes her human.
Just a human being with all our complexities and imperfections.
I'm not interested in throwing stones.
Maybe some on the jury might have the same opinion.
I would not be surprised.
Good point and does she have insight into the impact of her alleged post-offence behaviour?I think it was awful that she lied to the Doctors and the Public Health Official, and denied she had foraged any mushrooms. It was cruel and cost her loved ones their lives. She could have told the hospital about that immediately but she lied and lied some more.
Looks like she will claim she used some of the Tupperware container of dehydrated mushroom mix on the beef Wellingtons, not knowing it contained death cap mushrooms.
Of that she’s no longer bulimic but lives on laxatives, hence she keeps a handy supply of corks for when she needs to go out .It might be leading up to saying she hardly ate any of the lunch, because she has emotional issues with food and this was a stressful occasion.
I knew <well I was pretty sure> she had bulimia because she had those marks on her fingers “Russell’s Sign,” a pattern of calluses on the knuckles or back of the hand due to frequent purging (via self-induced vomiting) over a long period of time.I'm starting to see the direction this story is likely heading. She's laying the groundwork by talking about her low self-esteem due to her weight, plans for gastric reduction surgery, and secret bulimia, something she claims no one knew about. That part is probably going to be used to explain why she didn't get as sick as the others because she secretly purged after the meal.
It was possibly keyhole for a cartilage trim IMOThere seems to always be ONE doctor who will operate - usually specialists. My sister was told she needed surgery on her knee, but she shopped around to find other opinions and her knee has been fixed with physio and strapping and rehab, avoiding surgery.
My niece had tonsillitis once and the surgeon insisted on an operation, but the parents waited, and she never had tonsillitis again.
It seems like Erin might be the opposite.
There are some cut-happy doctors out there. It's not necessarily incompetence, it's just that they are trained that surgical intervention is king. It is not always necessary, though.
I'm frankly VERY surprised that a surgeon would operate on a pubescent teens knee, given how much their bones rapidly grow in that age group, unless of course, it was a car accident or trauma based injury which was essential.
Oh ok, wow. I thought the bulimia was a whole BS story her defense lawyers came up with and coached her inI knew <well I was pretty sure> she had bulimia because she had those marks on her fingers “Russell’s Sign,” a pattern of calluses on the knuckles or back of the hand due to frequent purging (via self-induced vomiting) over a long period of time.
At the time when I noticed this, I spoke to some women who had gone through bulimia and they recognised the marks on Erin’s hands and knew what they were, and I had discussed those stills of the media videos that showed Erin’s hands and fingers with them, and the women who had the personal knowledge of bulimia and other sleuths and I went back and forth analysing them and discussing what they meant.
Photos can be found in this article, with the marks circled and written about:
![]()
Eerie detail in photo of mushroom cook that no one noticed until now
A strange detail on mushroom chef Erin Patterson's hands shows two injuries to the middle finger of her right hand, a cut below the knuckle and an abrasion on the finger's nail bed.www.dailymail.co.uk
Article Credit: Candace Sutton / DMA
I know Erin would think no one else knew she had bulimia but once she became infamous, people online started to pay attention to everything she said or did, and in particular the way she looked.
How does the bulimia tie in with the case?
I suspect the bulimia will be used by the defence to explain why Erin didn’t get as sick as her guests. I imagine they will probably suggest that she vomited immediately after the lunch and therefore less of the toxins were digested.I knew <well I was pretty sure> she had bulimia because she had those marks on her fingers “Russell’s Sign,” a pattern of calluses on the knuckles or back of the hand due to frequent purging (via self-induced vomiting) over a long period of time.
At the time when I noticed this, I spoke to some women who had gone through bulimia and they recognised the marks on Erin’s hands and knew what they were, and I had discussed those stills of the media videos that showed Erin’s hands and fingers with them, and the women who had the personal knowledge of bulimia and other sleuths and I went back and forth analysing them and discussing what they meant.
Photos can be found in this article, with the marks circled and written about:
![]()
Eerie detail in photo of mushroom cook that no one noticed until now
A strange detail on mushroom chef Erin Patterson's hands shows two injuries to the middle finger of her right hand, a cut below the knuckle and an abrasion on the finger's nail bed.www.dailymail.co.uk
Article Credit: Candace Sutton / DMA
I know Erin would think no one else knew she had bulimia but once she became infamous, people online started to pay attention to everything she said or did, and in particular the way she looked.
How does the bulimia tie in with the case?
No I don’t think so.Oh ok, wow. I thought the bulimia was a whole BS story her defense lawyers came up with and coached her in
Oh ok, wow. I thought the bulimia was a whole BS story her defense lawyers came up with and coached her in
that’s great to know. With all the preluding of hospital phobia, imagined diseases and now the bulimia it seems like the lawyers crafted Erin’s story to lay groundwork to make up excuse over excuses for all the question marks in this caseInventing something like that and having your client say it under oath would be highly unethical behaviour and would lead to severe sanctions against lawyers caught doing it.
In R v Momodou [2005] 2 All ER 571; [2005] 1 WLR 3442, Judge LJ, in delivering the judgment of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, said: There is a dramatic distinction between witness training or coaching, and witness familiarisation. Training or coaching for witnesses in criminal proceedings (whether for prosecution or defence) is not permitted [bbm] -- Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules