- Joined
- Nov 11, 2013
- Messages
- 13,383
- Reaction score
- 87,595
1m ago05.21 BST
The jury has returned to the court room in Morwell.
The jury has returned to the court room in Morwell.
Oops!! Cue Panic!! Does she not think that police statements can be cross examined or something?Key Event
1m ago
The break is over and we turn to the topic of foraging
By Joseph Dunstan
The hearing's resumed, and lead prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC is continuing her cross-examination of accused murderer Erin Patterson.
Dr Rogers indicates she'd like to ask the 50-year-old about foraging for edible mushrooms and suggests Ms Patterson has made "new claims" to the jury about foraging.
"What do you mean by new?" Ms Patterson asks.
Dr Rogers says in her police interview a week after the lunch, Ms Patterson denied foraging for mushrooms. But she's since told the trial she has foraged.
"I told the police that I had never foraged but I didn't say that to the other witnesses, I said that I had not put foraged mushrooms in the meal," Ms Patterson says.
But if you were accused of a crime, and witnesses said the suspect was wearing a red shirt, and you were on trial, then how would those differing recollections of your shirt color be received?But disagreeing with someone/everyone is a completely different proposition to saying they're lying. They're two very different things.
If my recollection when catching up friends was that i was wearing a green shirt but they all think I was wearing a red shirt, I don't refer to them as liars or think they are lying.
But if you were accused of a crime, and witnesses said the suspect was wearing a red shirt, and you were on trial, then how would those differing recollections of your shirt color be received?
If you were in the witness box, and telling the court that you remembered that you wore a green shirt on the night of the crime, but your friends were testifying that you were wearing red, would you say they were being truthful?
Key Event
Just now
We're taken to computers seized at Erin's home before the jury is sent out again
By Joseph Dunstan
The hearing resumes and Dr Rogers picks up on a computer seized during a police search of Ms Patterson's home.
Specifically, the data extracted from the Cooler Master PC, which was found on top of a wardrobe in her son's bedroom.
"Do you accept that there were no records located on that computer related to edible or non-toxic mushrooms?" Dr Rogers asks.
Ms Patterson's defence barrister, Colin Mandy SC, objects and the jury exits the room again so a legal discussion can occur.
There's a ripple of laughter as it's noted the jury had only just minutes earlier returned from a break.
When my dishwasher broke and we got tired of washing them by hand. We were using alot of dishes and glassware.? Paper plates are not a regular thing for most Americans. We use them the same way you do. I can't remember the last time I bought paper plates or had them in my home.
I'm not sure that she's coming across as calm though. Som reports ar she has been rolling her eyes,Thanks @Lisa4 !
I think its sometimes really difficult to gauge how things are coming across for the jurors. It sounds like she has been delivering fairly calm responses.
Also being overly defensive at times and aggressive at other times, reportedly. I don't think she has been coming across well. IMOMostly sounding sure of herself, which should come across well.
That's true. But larger examples of conflicting information will be coming into play. IMOWith regard to those two points, I think by the time the jury come to deliberate, they won't be so important. Little bits she may be giving conflicting information on may not be hugely important.
I'd add OJ Simpson to that list.Two come to mind - Casey Anthony and Lizzie Borden were both acquitted of murder but to this day, most people believe that they actually committed the crimes they were charged with.
But if you were accused of a crime, and witnesses said the suspect was wearing a red shirt, and you were on trial, then how would those differing recollections of your shirt color be received?
If you were in the witness box, and telling the court that you remembered that you wore a green shirt on the night of the crime, but your friends were testifying that you were wearing red, would you say they were being truthful?
If you think that mushrooms are "smelling funny", why would you ever believe that storing them in a Tupperware container for ANY amount of time is going to make the smell go away? If they are going bad, the smell will only get worse.Key Event
2m ago
Erin says she put mushrooms from Asian grocer in food dehydrator
By Joseph Dunstan
The prosecutor then takes the accused to evidence previously given by health official Sally Ann Atkinson, who was leading the public health investigation into the death cap poisoning, amid fears toxic mushrooms were in the Victorian supply chain.
Ms Atkinson previously told the court that the listing of possible suburbs where dried mushrooms were purchased from an Asian grocer given by Ms Patterson changed during conversations, initially including Mount Waverley, before swapping to Glen Waverley.
Ms Patterson tells the court she believes Ms Atkinson was mistaken about that.
Dr Rogers notes that Ms Atkinson previously told the court that Ms Patterson had told her the dried mushrooms from the Asian grocer "smelled funny" when she bought them in April so she'd put them into a container, before using them months later in the beef Wellington.
She says she did it just the once, sometime after buying them.
![]()
Live: Erin Patterson faces questioning over deadly beef Wellington recipe
Accused triple-murderer Erin Patterson returns to the witness box for a seventh day of evidence. Follow live.www.abc.net.au