GUILTY Australia - 3 dead after eating wild mushrooms, Leongatha, Victoria, Aug 2023 *Arrest* #21

[BreakingNews]

Everything else aside, for me the fact that she didn't show any emotion at her conviction and then at her sentencing (other than scowling at the media) says it all: guilty as hell.

An innocent person would have shown strong emotion, IMO.

Agree. However I doubt that she will show any remorse until after her appeals. No point being remorseful, if she is going down the Not Guilty route for appeal.

 

[tmar]

Isn't her home going to be sold to pay trial lawyers?
So, for her appeal, she needs money OR is it 'pro bono' OR she has loads more money left?

 

[wallyworld]

Article published by The Conversation that explains the appeals by the DPP and Erin Patterson

There are now two appeals in the Erin Patterson mushroom murder case. What’s going on?
The Victorian Director of Public Prosecutions, who has carriage of the Erin Patterson murder case, has chosen to appeal against what he considers to be an overly lenient sentence.

This comes on the back of news last week the convicted murderer has instructed her lawyers to institute an appeal against her conviction.

These appeals could extend the life of the high profile case, or it could all quickly fizzle out. Here’s what’s happening now and what comes next.

Patterson’s appeal​

Erin Patterson has a new team of barristers, not only high profile lawyer Julian McMahon, but also well known criminal law academic and writer Richard Edney.

Under the Victorian Criminal Procedure Act, any person seeking to appeal a conviction or sentence must first seek leave to appeal. This basically means permission to appeal.

The matter of leave is heard by a single judge of the Supreme Court. This judge will determine whether there is sufficient merit in the appeal grounds (reasons) to warrant convening a full hearing of the Court of Appeal.

The judge could grant such leave to Patterson to appeal against her conviction on any or all of three grounds.

The first is where the verdict of the jury is deemed unreasonable and not supported by the evidence.
A second ground is that the trial judge insufficiently directed the jury’s attention to the defence case in the summing up. This is highly unlikely to be raised in the Patterson appeal.

A third ground is where there has been a substantial miscarriage of justice in the course of the trial. Typically this argument is based upon a defence submission that something has been allowed into evidence (by the trial judge) which should not have been introduced, or that something was not allowed into evidence (excluded by the trial judge) which should have been admitted into evidence.

One can strongly speculate that this is where the defence’s appeal submission will proceed.

The prosecution’s appeal​

Either party can appeal the sentence. Thus the prosecution must also get leave to appeal from a judge to advance its case.

In this case the prosecution is now seeking to do so, and will need to submit that the sentence is obviously – not merely arguably – overly lenient.

As Patterson was given three life sentences (to be served concurrently), the prosecution will argue that a 33 year non-parole period (not unusual in cases of single homicides) was clearly inadequate.

It’s highly improbable the defence will cross-appeal the severity of the sentence, given it is at the lower end of what a triple murderer could have expected to receive.

---

What happens if the appeals are allowed?​

If the defence appeal against conviction is allowed, the court may either acquit Patterson or send the whole case back for a retrial.

In the case of a successful appeal against sentence by the prosecution, the appeal court can either impose a longer non-parole period, or send the matter back to the trial judge for a re-sentencing.

There will be much to observe in the next phase of the criminal justice process. The first hurdle for Patterson is to get leave to appeal. At that hearing we will know for the first time where the appeal arguments are headed, and indeed, whether anything will further unfold.

Just in case you were wondering …​

Articles on The Conversation are written by academic experts with the help of journalists. All our work is free to read and republish. We want to give you the highest quality, unbiased information to help you make better decisions.

There are now two appeals in the Erin Patterson mushroom murder case. What’s going on?

Both the prosecutors and Patterson herself are continuing legal action, but for very different reasons. They could extend the case, or come to nothing at all.

theconversation.com

 

[Detechtive]

Isn't her home going to be sold to pay trial lawyers?
So, for her appeal, she needs money OR is it 'pro bono' OR she has loads more money left?

I don't think anyone knows for certain, but it appears she has run out of cash and will get legal aid for the appeal maybe? IMO

 

[JBowie]

The judge could grant such leave to Patterson to appeal against her conviction on any or all of three grounds.

The first is where the verdict of the jury is deemed unreasonable and not supported by the evidence.

Can't see that being the case.

A second ground is that the trial judge insufficiently directed the jury’s attention to the defence case in the summing up. This is highly unlikely to be raised in the Patterson appeal.

Can't see that being the case, either.

A third ground is where there has been a substantial miscarriage of justice in the course of the trial. Typically this argument is based upon a defence submission that something has been allowed into evidence (by the trial judge) which should not have been introduced, or that something was not allowed into evidence (excluded by the trial judge) which should have been admitted into evidence.

Nope, can't see that either.

My decision: APPEAL DISALLOWED.

 

[JBowie]

Agree. However I doubt that she will show any remorse until after her appeals. No point being remorseful, if she is going down the Not Guilty route for appeal.

Killer psychopaths have zero remorse, although they may try to fake it.

 

[Detechtive]

Can't see that being the case.



Can't see that being the case, either.



Nope, can't see that either.

My decision: APPEAL DISALLOWED.

I'll bet on you v Erin/her legal team.