I am using my imagination here:
"we were too wasted to remember anything at all except the part where she totally definitely left here completely safe, question us about that part of the story as much as you want, we got that part all worked out between us. Left at 3:30, how do we know? We heard hte door. It's for sure. Definitely wasn't here after 3:30. Nope she got into the car. how do we know? We heard it leave right away. Could anyone have gotten into it with her? No, no way, it was right by the door."
Seriously is it just me or does it sound like everything they "know" from the partygoers came to them in the form of denial, deflection, and self-interest? IMO, naturally.
:banghead:
If I was a mother questioning my kids and their buddies and got those kinds of answers my assumption would be that she definitely left WITH somebody, possibly by 3:30am, and that everyone else in the house knows it and needs to be separated, questioned, and played against one another. NO SUPPER FOR ANY OF YOU!
Above BBM....IMO...
Don't know if any of you are/were fans of the TV show "24"....but how I wish we had Jack Bauer and his "questionable but very effective" interrogation tactics. He could get the answers out of ANYONE!! With many cases here on WS, the thought that goes through my mind is "they need to go Jack Bauer on his (or her) a**"
SO glad Miss D called Sgt Pooley......but there's still no way I truly believe that NO ONE saw her after the accident, when she came back to change clothes. I think A would have been way too AMPED up and LOUD, saying "OMG!! I just crashed my car, etc"