"Why do you think the state is not calling BB's ex-wife Melani?" -- What does MBP have to offer the case, factually, about the attempt to kill BB, that she would share? I am with the judge in thinking she portends to offer nothing that's actual evidence re this event, so there's no justification to have her testify.
There were two highly incriminating texts for her in Charles' trial, one before and one after the murder. I wonder if something similar exists in BB's case. How are they going to prove that she ordered Alex to kill BB? Will Chad be mentioned at all?rsbm
LVD didn't name MBP so the judge didn't ask about her. I do think she could help the prosecution but not help LVD. It does look like MBP is the one who gave BB's new address to LVD.
LVD doesn't really understand or care about relevance. She seems to only want to call witnesses so that she can try to harass and smear the witness or the victim, as she did in the prior trial (like asking about CV's dating life), which doesn't help her case. It actually gives a motive for her to want to kill them.
But going by the witness list, it doesn't look like the state is going to provide much in the way of motive. No insurance company employee even, just LE and some civilian normies (not in the cult). They're apparently just going to show that she and Alex did it with very clear evidence.
Thank you for explaining how the law works with MBP and the state not calling her.Thank you for the kind words!
"Why do you think the state is not calling BB's ex-wife Melani?" -- What does MBP have to offer the case, factually, about the attempt to kill BB, that she would share? I am with the judge in thinking she portends to offer nothing that's actual evidence re this event, so there's no justification to have her testify.
The same applies to the others you mentioned.
In the bigger scheme of things, I agree with you that MBP had a huge vested interest in seeing BB dead -- which would imply that she could have been a co-conspirator with LVD to kill BB for insurance proceeds. But is she going to testify to ANYTHING that shows that? No way, nohow, no chance.
For there to be useful testimony, you need:
1 Someone who saw (or knew of) something happening --ie, they can't offer their personal guesses and speculation (beyond a very limited window),
2 That something has to be relevant to THIS accusation,
3 The prosec or def has to know what that is (ie, they can't just haul them to court in a fishing expedition, hoping to find some previously-undiscovered something on the stand out of the blue),
4 The witness to some degree must be willing to testify, AND
5 The something can't serve to put the witness in legal jeopardy in some way (otherwise, they just plead the 5th, and the end result is a big waste of time).
I just don't think there's anything that's both useful AND available to be derived from any of those side characters in the bigger CD-LVD saga.
Oh, and BTW, the idea that you'd offer MBP immunity to testify seems way backwards. They already have LVD locked up for life x 3, and this is just window dressing. So if you have knowledge that MBP is involved, then you want to try MBP and get her locked up too, rather than give her a free ride where she can never be tried, in a quest to get a conviction on something that will have no practical consequence to LVD.
Again just my 2c. (And I'm certainly open to an explanation of something I'm missing.)
Too bad the judge can't shock her when she gets snippy with him.@cathyrusson
"Are you done?" Lori still hasn't figured out that she doesn't know how to represent herself. She insisted that in no case EVER does a jury questionnaire list the defendant's name.
"Every single one of my motions has been denied." #LoriVallowDaybell asks the judge to recuse himself. Judge: "Well, file motions that have a legal basis, and I might grant them."
Colby very recently watched the Daybell children's TV interview from a few years ago and commented on it on his yt channel. The way he looks into the camera when Emma says in a monotone voice: "My father needs someone to be a voice for him". Colby doesn't take bs from anyone these days. If only the Daybells woke up and embraced reality.
Emma and Garth…they both lied for their dad and have to live with the fact he planned the murder of their mother and may have killed her himself. How do they sleep at night?I think Colby has said he hasn't watched any of the trials. Wait till he sees Emma and Garth on the stand.
Hi @TriciaHey Websleuths sleuths,
I need help with a bit of research.
I'm trying to find Summer's CrimeCon 2024 interview with Nate Eaton. I thought it was on the CrimeCon website but I can't find it anywhere. If anyone could post a link I would be very grateful.
Also looking for a copy of Stacey Cox Cope's wedding announcement. If you find it you can post it here.
Thank you all.
Tricia
Megan gives a lot of insight here to the family dynamics. The info she provides regarding MBP’s parents marriage & divorce is very timely with the next trial coming up.New from Megan
"Barry Cox Backstory: How Generational Family Dynamics Shaped Lori Vallow Daybell’s MindsetJoin me as I provide a full backstory on Barry Cox, Lori Vallow Daybell’s father, and discuss the generational family dynamics that contributed to Lori’s mindset and legal ideas in this true crime saga! Lori, the “Doomsday Mom,” was convicted in her Arizona trial for Charles Vallow’s murder, and I’ve been pointing out all along that she wears a mask in public—her family history reveals why. Barry Cox’s anti-government views, including his book on tax evasion and battles with the IRS, shaped Lori’s beliefs, blending with her LDS Church and Mormonism-driven doomsday cult ideology. This video explores how high-demand religious influences, generational trauma, and her alleged narcissism fueled her actions, offering insights into religious extremism and strategies for combatting narcissism.'
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.