AZ - Lori Vallow Daybell charged w/ conspiring to kill ex-husband Charles Vallow and another relative, Brandon Boudreaux, Chandler, Maricopa County,

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #661
They said the first trial will be the "2021" case (Charles Vallow) and they will set a date for the second trial (Brandon Boudreaux) at the conclusion of the first trial.

Okay - thanks for that additional info on when Brandon's case will happen! Will correct my notes. 1733563647341.gif
 
  • #662
  • #663
As long as she has access to hair and beauty products she will drag it out if it’s up to her. She still thinks that she is in a pageant show.
Bingo! I really can’t believe the court is buying into this sh**show.
 
  • #664
That article was published yesterday (5 Dec. 2024). And, as to your second question: "I thought it started 3/31/25 with jury selection??" -- as Ms. Vallow herself would say: "Correct."

[It really irked me that she had to "corroborate" every statement/question addressed to her by the Judge. Instead of saying, "Yes, your honor," she said "correct" -- as if he was asking her if HIS understanding was right.]
What a clown show this will be.
Yes, and I wouldn't miss for anything, LOL.
 
  • #665
It just came to me that LVD will more than likely be doing her own voir dire? :eek::rolleyes:
 
  • #666
 
  • #667
I guess at the end of the trial, if it doesn't go in her favor, she can file an appeal based upon ineffective counsel.
 
  • #668
I guess at the end of the trial, if it doesn't go in her favor, she can file an appeal based upon ineffective counsel.
and say that she was denied appropriate and effective counsel.
 
  • #669
and say that she was denied appropriate and effective counsel.
That's exactly why I stated that the judge needs to insist on her mental competency review.
 
  • #670
 
  • #671
At 4:50 the Judge tells her that if , at any time during the trial she changes her mind and wants her defense lawyers to take over, she will be waiving her right to claim ineffective counsel

 
Last edited:
  • #672
That's exactly why I stated that the judge needs to insist on her mental competency review.

The court system and judge are not naive, and understand the potential games-playing a devious defendant might try, so they take steps in advance to foreclose those possibilities.

What you suggest was already done in full - and then some. She passed with flying colors.

Two doctors examined her and reported to the court she's competent. The judge then tossed out one of them, and had a different doc assigned to render his opinion. He said the same thing - that she is competent.

The judge also told her in open court that he reserves the right, if he sees behavior from her during the trial that indicates she is not competent, to remove her as her own counsel and assign another. He also told her that if that becomes necessary, she cannot make a claim of ineffective counsel (herself) afterwards, and she must agree to that condition before she is allowed to represent herself at all. As was already noted, he ALSO told her the same would be true if she voluntarily stepped down mid-trial as her own counsel. In response, she declared her own full competence, and agreed to those conditions.
 
Last edited:
  • #673
Theme song for LVD.

 
  • #674
  • #675
  • #676
dbm
 
Last edited:
  • #677
dbm
 
Last edited:
  • #678
  • #679
  • #680
“Daybell Defence team”
sure… rotfl
moo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
142
Guests online
2,470
Total visitors
2,612

Forum statistics

Threads
632,115
Messages
18,622,283
Members
243,024
Latest member
Grand kat
Back
Top