- Joined
- May 21, 2013
- Messages
- 19,673
- Reaction score
- 151,919
I understand. And I didn't interpret your comments that way at all.
I just wanted to point out that in live coverage, there will always be some confusion and reporter error. It's the nature of the beast. And I know you're not implying otherwise, but I just think AC has done a phenomenal job with that live blog. He is amazingly accurate and thorough given the conditions.
I do think there's a bit of a tendency -- and, again, I don't address this to you personally -- for people to think the lawyers are missing something, but everything is planned in advance. And they almost always check with their co-counsel to make sure there are no extra questions before wrapping up an examination.
I couldn't agree more on all points. What may appear to be "unasked questions" is more than likely a case of "we haven't arrived at that point of the trial yet" (or a simple case of "it doesn't matter because wait until we question this witness and then you'll understand). I keep trying to remind myself of this when I find myself wondering why this, or why not that. As for Adam Carter's live blog - no two ways about it, he's doing a fantastic job. Grateful we have "trial by twitter" even if it sounds like I'm being a smarty pants about that. I'm really not.