Good Morning everyone, and thank you for the new interest!! Bob's case, at least to me, isnt really that complicated although the probate/civil cases involving the trusts are.
The timelines provided by JuM, in her own words, seem to put her husband in the house when Bob disappeared. He was, apparently, the last know person to see him. There was a heated family meeting the day before where his children found out that he would be adding his new wife to his estate planning. Bob seems to have disappeared prior to being able to carry that out.
The actions of this family after his disappearance are nothing short of bizarre. There was an immediate attempt to grab control of his money, predicated by the desire to offer a reward...and offer which was made years later. YEARS. The venom began to spew within days in an attempt, IMO, to make their father so detestable, no one would ever bother to look for him. His grandson, who owed a shocking amount of money to Bob, immediately ceased payment on that debt. By his own deposition, this is an agreement he claims was to go into effect upon Bob's death. He stopped paying on the first day of August 2009, and never stock piled that money for the happy day when his grandfather returned.
And then there is the memorabilia list.
Thank you for the new twist on all of the borrowed goods, K!!! That makes perfect sense.
As to Bob giving money away prior to his disappearance, that was his money to give pure and simple. We know from PB's testimony that there were many outstanding family loans, all of which were well documented. Apparently there was no list of money simply given, or if there was it wasnt turned over as discovery during the trial with BL. A trial that got the Harrod daughters soundly spanked.
And then there is a transparent attempt to charge their step mother rent in her own home or reduce her stipend. Another hearing that they lost.
Rest assured that several of these judges see this case for what it is. A criminal case with civil/probate components. jmvho