- Joined
- Oct 4, 2009
- Messages
- 1,413
- Reaction score
- 1,572
What a sweet story. I can almost taste the pastries. See in your case Grainne, you and your siblings main interest is your father's happiness. Sadly, in Mr. Harrod's case his happiness was of no interest to his children, sil and grandson. They might say they were interested in their father's happiness but there are no actions, none, to support such a statement.
Bob was seen as a means to an inheritance. Anything which stood in the way of receiving that inheritance was a threat. The hairdresser had nothing to gain by Mr. Harrod's disappearance. Any gifts she received were stopped by his disappearance.
Additionally, Mr. Harrod remarrying was a liability to the inheritiance. Mr. Harrod marrying anyone who might out live him was a HUGE liability to the funds these greedy vultures expected. Too risky to get rid of his wife, plus he would have choices, if he were still living.
The only thing to prevent Bob from depleting his daughters, sil and grandsons perceived inheritance was to get rid of the person who could spend his own money, Bob.
It's all crystal clear when looking at the entire picture and all the known facts. Not the bit's and pieces of bs the daughters toss out to deliberate muddy the waters.
The day will come when PPD puts this case to bed and I'm willing to bet money more than one family member will be doing some serious prison time. IMO, all five will do time, two of whom will probably do less than the other three.
:goodpost: