- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 10,753
- Reaction score
- 71,073
Well, even if they don’t have enough evidence to accuse but think that the man can be linked to the murders, should not they do something to make the community safer?By Anne Kingston 2019
''In its reporting on the bid to knock down the house, CTV stumbled upon what could be that very thing—a previously unreported, potentially key piece of evidence. In canvassing the neighbourhood for reaction, a reporter interviewed a woman who chose not to appear on camera or make her name public. She revealed that she handed over surveillance video to police that showed a car sitting in the Shermans’ driveway on Dec. 14, a day before the bodies were found and a day after the couple was last reported seen alive. In it, a man was seen “sometimes sitting in his car for up to 15 minutes, then going inside” the house.
The fluke disclosure is a reminder that the Toronto Police Service has more evidence than the public knows—and also that the police don’t share evidence with the public.''
ETA 2019
''Toronto Police Chief Mark Saunders says his officers have interviewed the mystery man who spent 29 minutes inside the home of Barry and Honey Sherman while they lay dead in the basement.![]()
Chief Mark Saunders on Barry and Honey Sherman case: ‘Our officers did not drop the ball’
Chief Mark Saunders says his officers have interviewed the mystery man who spent 29 minutes inside the home of Barry and Honey Sherman.www.thestar.com
“I can tell you we knew who the person was, why they were there, (the person) was interviewed,” Saunders said Tuesday in response to questions from reporters following a police board meeting.''
The problem of the case lies in Shermans’ money and businesses, so theoretically, there may be too many people interested in killing them. On the other hand, there may be simply two old people and a person who enjoys killing. He might be a threat to any community in general.