- Joined
- Jan 17, 2004
- Messages
- 43,094
- Reaction score
- 235,921
Is it one of the datasets that Musk eliminated from public access?Not coming up for me.
Is it one of the datasets that Musk eliminated from public access?Not coming up for me.
Not to mention an indicator of likely global recession.The oil price falling probably isn't that good for the USA overall as it's an net oil exporter.
![]()
List of countries by oil exports - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Stripping Canada's oil exports out of the trade figures doesn't just eliminate America's trade deficit, it turns it on its headTrade deficit is so easily explained, but Trump refuses to see it. The trade deficit with Canada is a result of the USA needing Canada oil. Eliminate the oil, the deficit disappears. There is an explanation for all deficits. The most obvious is that 340 million people in the USA are massive consumers and they want stuff that is produced elsewhere. Eliminate the disposable product mentality, deficit disappears.
USA government arithmetic seems to omit critical datasets in all their calculations.
It’s there for me.Can anyone else access this government website? It's saying unavailable for me.
Wine, Beer and Spirits
www.fas.usda.gov
That's interesting. Majestic, which I think is the largest of the UK wine etc warehouses in the UK, has a small section for Californian wine in its stores but its very small compared to the shelf space given over to the other New World wines. I think the problem with some Old World wines (and I'm thinking of Rioja here) is that they can be hideously over-oaked (which is also a problem I tend to find with many Australian wines).California wine is really popular in Ireland. Many people prefer it to the old world European styles. But we also import a huge amount of new world wines from Chile, and also Australia, NZ, Argentina and South Africa, so I guess they will have to fill that niche if it comes to that.
I'm not a whisk(e)y drinker so will take your word for it on their respective tastes and the preferences of younger people. Do you think this is a genuine preference for the taste or a response to advertising?Bourbons like Jack Daniel's and Jim Beam are also pretty popular here and not really comparable in taste to Irish whiskey. I think a younger demographic prefers bourbon. Also most Irish whiskey is aged in bourbon barrels so not sure what will happen there. Is wood exempt for now? I believe Irish whiskey can also be aged in port wine or sherry barrels if they do go tit for tat with tariffs down the line.
On the whiskey, I don't personally like or drink any of them but would recognise the taste difference. I think Jack Daniel's etc have very good brand awareness and marketing, but American whiskeys are probably smoother.than Irish whiskey (open to correction here) and are often mixed with sodas here. Scotch is very distinctive and smoky.That's interesting. Majestic, which I think is the largest of the UK wine etc warehouses in the UK, has a small section for Californian wine in its stores but its very small compared to the shelf space given over to the other New World wines. I think the problem with some Old World wines (and I'm thinking of Rioja here) is that they can be hideously over-oaked (which is also a problem I tend to find with many Australian wines).
Majestic for those not familiar with it: https://www.majestic.co.uk/
I'm not a whisk(e)y drinker so will take your word for it on their respective tastes and the preferences of younger people. Do you think this is a genuine preference for the taste or a response to advertising?
If Bourbon barrels become difficult to come by, it might be worth considering Madeira barrels alongside port and sherry ones.
Incidentally, one small UK artisan coffee roaster ages some of its green coffee beans in bourbon or whisky barrels during the autumn. It's a regular seasonal offering with a good boozy kick.
Canada was also one of the founder signatories to the CPTPP so had already chosen to align its economic future with Asia-Pac.
Canadians have been saying this since Trump started the war with Canada but, sadly, so many in the USA believe Trump propaganda.Stripping Canada's oil exports out of the trade figures doesn't just eliminate America's trade deficit, it turns it on its head
Last year the USA had a $63 billion overall trade deficit with Canada. Once you take oil out of the equation, the USA had a $50.9 billion trade **surplus** with Canada!
To my mind the whole thing is completely mad. Who in their right mind would start a trade war with a country with which they have a massive non-oil trade surplus!
![]()
Market minute: U.S. runs a trade surplus with Canada excluding oil
The oil trade between the two countries is a function of geographical proximity, efficiency, cost and infrastructure concerns.realeconomy.rsmus.com
Canada/CBC had an article over the weekend with the same silver-lining message. Canadian universities and research agencies welcome people who are silenced in the USA by the USA government.the perspective of a dutch economist about opportunities that are now created for other countries. it reminds me of the saying to “never waste a good crisis”
According to De Geus, there is now a de facto war economy. And there are also opportunities for Amsterdam. "You can of course bring a lot of talent here at the moment. I remember that with Brexit we drove through London with vans - Minister Ollongren did the same at the time - with the message ‘come and work in Amsterdam’ if you are in a bank. We have to do that in the U.S. now too."
"There are a lot of people who are fired or afraid of the system or who want to leave America at all. From universities but also from intelligence agencies. All that knowledge you can bring here now. So we have to open the gates like crazy and really see this as an opportunity. Of course, it's almost ironic that America was created in the image of Amsterdam in the golden age. Tolerant, a liberal economy where a lot of immigration was possible. That was the picture the Founding Fathers mirrored. In America, that ends now. And for it to return to Amsterdam again would of course be beautiful irony."
![]()
Grote verliezen op Beursplein 5: "Amsterdam moet profiteren van handelsoorlog met VS"
Grote verliezen op Beursplein 5: "Amsterdam moet profiteren van handelsoorlog met VS"www.at5.nl
Which the UK is also a member of now, of course. If some way could be found to bring about a CPTPP-EU deal, you'd then have virtually the entire developed world sans the USA in one free trade area.Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)
Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)
The Indo-Pacific is now the world’s leading region of economic growth, offering big opportunities for trade and expansion. Canadian businesses can get ahead of the global competition by using the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)—a free trade agreement between Canada and 10 other countries in the Indo-Pacific: Australia, Brunei, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam.
Which the UK is also a member of now, of course. If some way could be found to bring about a CPTPP-EU deal, you'd then have virtually the entire developed world sans the USA in one free trade area.
It's very difficult to imagine that happening in practice as the EU is generally protectionist rather than in favour of free trade. There are so many competing and entrenched interests between the member states that the bloc as a whole struggles to reach agreement with other parties. For example:Which the UK is also a member of now, of course. If some way could be found to bring about a CPTPP-EU deal, you'd then have virtually the entire developed world sans the USA in one free trade area.
The media has let Trump lies go on and on for years without corrections. what else is new?Canadians have been saying this since Trump started the war with Canada but, sadly, so many in the USA believe Trump propaganda.
Trump started with the $63bn deficit (oil purchase), exaggerated until it was a $250bn deficit. He then replaced the word "trade deficit" with "subsidy". Today, he boldly states that the USA subsidizes Canada in the amount of $250bn, and no one blinks. USA news outlets broadcast this false information and at no time follow up with facts. It's mind-boggling to see the USA government manipulate the population with propaganda.