Given the present circumstances including the police report not yet finalized, would it seem logical that B’s family would hurry to hold a “celebration of life” for B at this time? Grieving takes on many different shades but I’d be surprised if they’ve got anywhere near the point of understanding. Suicide is one thing but B is also accused of needlessly taking 3 innocent victims with him.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/snook-absence-costs-1.5116716
Compassion is sorely lacking here, IMO. AS is not a prisoner, and even prisoners are allowed to attend funerals of loved ones, in certain circumstances. Even prisoners who have done terrible things.
There may not have been a formal service, but why couldn't AS have been granted time with his son's remains privately, under supervision? The answer may be in that video that he is not allowed to see, nor does he have a transcript or an audio recording?
Thinking back to another father's statement about how important it was to bring his boy home.
At the time of notification she did not have custody, as he had already turned 19.
My guess is no way would they give an actual video clip to anyone at this point. Possibly after the investigation is wrapped up, but probably not even then...Assuming there is a video (I think there is)... do we know how the family members viewed it? I always assumed (dangerous, I know) that the RCMP played the clip for the family members and didn’t actually give them the clip.
How do we know his son’s remains were viewed other family members? The autopsy was conducted in Manitoba, not B.C. From there it would become the family members son’s to instruct a Funeral Home, did they wish for the bodies to be transported back to BC or did they all fly to Manitoba for a viewing prior to crematation or just issue instructions for cremation. If the remains were cremated, they could still be in Manitoba, held by the Funeral Home.
I’m interested in the absence of facts - how does AS know a funeral and burial has already taken place?
AND, there is nothing stopping AS from having a memorial, a service, or whatever. But that would mean him having to do something rather than him asking for something...We don't know if there was a funeral from any official source.
We do know that AS has said that he not been allowed, and wont be allowed.
We do know that someone told him about the video, and that person may have told him other things, too.
AND, there is nothing from stopping AS from having a memorial, a service, or whatever. But that would mean him having to do something rather than him asking for something...
does custodial parent standing not end at death of the child? if AS is on birth certificate then he should have legal rights to the same info. I don't think a will is just instant I think it has a process to under go.
No, there are two birth certificates in adoptive cases. The original has bio parents, and the revised BC has the adoptive parents named.a adopted parents name would be on the birth certificate. adoption is not anywhere near the same as child custody.
I hear you.Some people need to spend time with the remains. It is often based in family tradition and cultural background. As a parent who never got to say goodbye to his only child, this is what he may want. IMO. I think other parents who have lost children have the same need. JMO.
This hit the nail on the head for me. My thoughts exactly.Beautiful, thoughful post. Thanks.
"Most of them seem possible even if they are at odds with other scenarios that also seem possible"
So true!
No, not if it wasn't legally changed.This is a genuine question. Can DS be the custodial parent if her son lives with his grandmother? Wouldn't the grandmother have custody?
I believe any custody agreement would end at the time the "child" turned 18, which would have happenedAug 4, 2018.
At that time Bryer would be deemed an adult.
...