- Joined
- May 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,403
- Reaction score
- 49
(BBM)
Again, I don't know much about the law, but could another reason be that they are pretty confident that RW is going to be spending at least the next 25 years in prison? That MEH would probably never want to live in either that house or cottage again and would want to sell both and with sole ownership simplifying the sales? Could MEH be concerned that RW might attempt suicide again and succeed, further tying up the distribution of assets?
Just guessing here how their lawyer may defend this suit.
JMO
A lot of this depends on how the properties were owned. If it was joint ownership, and RW tries and succeeds at suicide, then ownership is automatically transferred to MEH, so it wouldn't be drawn out. They just need a copy of the death certificate and file documents changing title solely to her name. If it was sole ownership in his name only, then they may have wanted title transferred in her name, because if he does succeed in suicide, unless he has a will, it turns into a legal nightmare.
MOO is that they have added MEH as party to the civil action so that the assets that have been transferred over to her (from her husband) will be frozen and she is unable to sell them until judgement is reached. It's a standard legal procedure no doubt. I feel sorry for MEH, first she's had to deal with her husband's other life, now she's getting dragged into court because of him.