I keep reading these threads and seeing a number of posters who believe this was an "accidental death".
However, what I haven't seen is anyone post a scenario that makes accidental believable.
How does anyone explain the defense looking for SODDI, the hits on the back yard, the decomp in the trunk, the matching bags, the duct tape, the nanny stories, the dumping of the car, the not reporting Caylee missing for 31 days, the imaginary phone call from Caylee the day the LE started investigating Casey, the imaginary job, and leaving your child so close to home for six months so that the crime scene is so degraded, the tattoo, the lack of remorse or sadness during the jail visit videos, etc. This is a very shortened list.
So, I am sincerely asking. Because the only way I can see the Defense coming up with any defense at all, is to attack the forensic evidence and to come with an accidental death explanation. With a defendant who will refuse to testify.
Will someone please post a 'proposed defense" I can consider. I don't believe the choice for the jury will either be the death penalty or accidental, I think it will be guilty or not guilty. And I just can't see a not guilty charge happening, with what we know to date.
Remember Baez said we will all understand what happened, at trial.