Still catching up.. So please scroll on past And just disregard if this is a duplicate opinion that's already been thoroughly discussed..
In reading the wording of this latest info of the cell phone use timeline I
Find it to be easily read that whomever had possession of the cell phone in question it certainly appears IMO(again due to the specific wording) that whomever it was attempted to connect to the voicemail(2times) was quite likely not the owner/user of the cell phone.. With using the very specific wording "at 3:17am
attempted to connect to voicemail" rather than just simply stating "at 3:17am connected to voicemail".. This specific wording makes a huge difference IMO and is very much implying that it was an"attempt" rather than an actual "connection".. Huge IMO due to the fact that this would be expected if it were someone other than the owner of the phone being the person
At 3:17am "attempting" to connect with voicemail and would IMO very likely NOT HAVE THE OWNERS PASSCODE TO ACTUALLY MAKE THAT CONNECTION TO THE VOICEMAIL.. Hope that makes sense..
As I said if already has been thoroughly discussed please just disregard and keep on scrolling past.. I'll be caught up shortly