CO - BARRY ARRESTED AGAIN - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *Case dismissed w/o prejudice* *found in 2023* #118

[Seattle1]

Thanks Seattle. So the judge could very well set bail under the date of the murder of Suzanne and lower bail.

If the right lawyer works magic (because lawyers and judges run in the same circles) then it is possible to get his bail amount reduced. It is also possible that all his funds are being held legally in MM1’s name.
I will be very disappointed if he gets bail a second time.

I cannot envision a scenario where BM doesn’t go to prison for murder one. We will see.

The rub here is that a Judge can't deny bail to a defendant charged with murder in the first degree! For most Judges, they took this temporary denial of their duty seriously and wouldn't think of lowering bail when they shouldn't even be allowed bail as the Constitution intended!

I'd be shocked if the Court found any argument by BM's defense compelling enough to reduce his bail-- sufficient where he'd be allowed to walk around pending trial. BM is vindictive! He attempted to get every prosecutor who worked on his case disbarred, and succeeded with one. And let's not forget BM sued more than 25 officials in neighboring Chaffee County for $15M, and his appeal is still open. Everybody has reason to fear this monster! JMO

 

[Love Never Fails]

The rub here is that a Judge can't deny bail to a defendant charged with murder in the first degree! For most Judges, they took this temporary denial of their duty seriously and wouldn't think of lowering bail when they shouldn't even be allowed bail as the Constitution intended!

I'd be shocked if the Court found any argument by BM's defense compelling enough to reduce his bail-- sufficient where he'd be allowed to walk around pending trial. Let's not forget BM sued more than 25 officials in neighboring Chaffee County for $15M, and his appeal is still open. Everybody has reason to fear this monster! JMO

And he has nothing to lose by getting rid of 25 officials. I hate to even consider all he did to Suzanne! I feel sure DA Kelly had thought through the ramifications of him being on bail. I imagine MG is afraid right now.

 

[Tragg]

I don't believe we will see a hearing to deny bond under the amended Constitutional bail provision. The judge set the bond at $3M when the indictment was issued, and Morphew has indicated that he wants it reduced. Given that he claims to be broke, the prime question is whether he will be able to get a bond amount he can pay or secure, or that someone can put up for him.

Here are the statutory criteria that guide a judge's decision in these cases (highlighted and excerpted by me):

Section 16-4-103 - Setting and selection type of bond - criteria

...


(3)(a) The type of bond and conditions of release shall be sufficient to reasonably ensure the appearance of the person as required and to protect the safety of any person or the community, taking into consideration the individual characteristics of each person in custody, including the person's financial condition.

(b) In determining the type of bond and conditions of release, if practicable and available in the jurisdiction, the court shall use an empirically developed risk assessment instrument designed to improve pretrial release decisions by providing to the court information that classifies a person in custody based upon predicted level of risk of pretrial failure.

(4) When the type of bond and conditions of release are determined by the court, the court shall:

(a) Presume that all persons in custody are eligible for release on bond with the appropriate and least-restrictive conditions consistent with provisions in paragraph (a) of subsection (3) of this section unless a person is otherwise ineligible for release pursuant to the provisions of section 16-4-101 and section 19 of article II of the Colorado constitution. A monetary condition of release must be reasonable, and any other condition of conduct not mandated by statute must be tailored to address a specific concern.

...

(5) The court may also consider the following criteria as appropriate and relevant in making a determination of the type of bond and conditions of release:

(a) The employment status and history of the person in custody;

(b) The nature and extent of family relationships of the person in custody;

(c) Past and present residences of the person in custody;

(d) The character and reputation of the person in custody;

(e) Identity of persons who agree to assist the person in custody in attending court at the proper time;

(f) The likely sentence, considering the nature and the offense presently charged;

(g) The prior criminal record, if any, of the person in custody and any prior failures to appear for court;

(h) Any facts indicating the possibility of violations of the law if the person in custody is released without certain conditions of release;

(i) Any facts indicating that the defendant is likely to intimidate or harass possible witnesses; and

(j) Any other facts tending to indicate that the person in custody has strong ties to the community and is not likely to flee the jurisdiction."

Morphew will argue that his compliance with the conditions of release in the 11th JD proceedings should satisfy the court that he is not a flight risk or a threat to the community or any individual. My guess is that family members will be willing to pledge their property as security, and that either a daughter or friend will offer to provide a Colorado residence. Whether that will be persuasive is, of course, problematic. But IMO it is not utterly beyond the realm of possibility that Morphew will see his bond reduced on this basis.

 

[Momofthreeboys]

I don't believe we will see a hearing to deny bond under the amended Constitutional bail provision. The judge set the bond at $3M when the indictment was issued, and Morphew has indicated that he wants it reduced. Given that he claims to be broke, the prime question is whether he will be able to get a bond amount he can pay or secure, or that someone can put up for him.

Here are the statutory criteria that guide a judge's decision in these cases (highlighted and excerpted by me):

Section 16-4-103 - Setting and selection type of bond - criteria

...


(3)(a) The type of bond and conditions of release shall be sufficient to reasonably ensure the appearance of the person as required and to protect the safety of any person or the community, taking into consideration the individual characteristics of each person in custody, including the person's financial condition.

(b) In determining the type of bond and conditions of release, if practicable and available in the jurisdiction, the court shall use an empirically developed risk assessment instrument designed to improve pretrial release decisions by providing to the court information that classifies a person in custody based upon predicted level of risk of pretrial failure.

(4) When the type of bond and conditions of release are determined by the court, the court shall:

(a) Presume that all persons in custody are eligible for release on bond with the appropriate and least-restrictive conditions consistent with provisions in paragraph (a) of subsection (3) of this section unless a person is otherwise ineligible for release pursuant to the provisions of section 16-4-101 and section 19 of article II of the Colorado constitution. A monetary condition of release must be reasonable, and any other condition of conduct not mandated by statute must be tailored to address a specific concern.

...

(5) The court may also consider the following criteria as appropriate and relevant in making a determination of the type of bond and conditions of release:

(a) The employment status and history of the person in custody;

(b) The nature and extent of family relationships of the person in custody;

(c) Past and present residences of the person in custody;

(d) The character and reputation of the person in custody;

(e) Identity of persons who agree to assist the person in custody in attending court at the proper time;

(f) The likely sentence, considering the nature and the offense presently charged;

(g) The prior criminal record, if any, of the person in custody and any prior failures to appear for court;

(h) Any facts indicating the possibility of violations of the law if the person in custody is released without certain conditions of release;

(i) Any facts indicating that the defendant is likely to intimidate or harass possible witnesses; and

(j) Any other facts tending to indicate that the person in custody has strong ties to the community and is not likely to flee the jurisdiction."

Morphew will argue that his compliance with the conditions of release in the 11th JD proceedings should satisfy the court that he is not a flight risk or a threat to the community or any individual. My guess is that family members will be willing to pledge their property as security, and that either a daughter or friend will offer to provide a Colorado residence. Whether that will be persuasive is, of course, problematic. But IMO it is not utterly beyond the realm of possibility that Morphew will see his bond reduced on this basis.

I also think they will ask for a bond reduction. The current bond is a huge leap from the original half million bond from the original trial attempt and from all records he was compliant during the original trial attempt. Whether the judge agrees and what that amount ultimately is and whether Morphew can obtain it are totally separate issues.

 

[Tragg]

So let's consider the factors for setting bail that we know about. I'll pretend I'm the judge.

The conditions I set when the indictment issued are all standard. I set the type as a cash bond, because I don't believe any other type gives me the assurance I need that a defendant charged with first degree murder will comply with those terms. This is true for both rich defendants and indigent defendants.

I presume that Mr. Morphew is eligible for release on bond with the appropriate and least-restrictive conditions. Per the statute, a monetary condition of release must be reasonable in the defendant's circumstances, considering the criteria set forth in the statute, as follows

(a) Mr. Morphew is unemployed and has complained that he cannot get work because public awareness of his previous case has affected his reputation.

(b) Mr. Morphew has no family residing in the 12th Judicial District.

(c) Mr. Morphew lived in Indiana, and his extended family still resides there. He resided in Colorado with his wife and children for a short period, but relocated to Arizona after charges against him in the 11th Judicial District were dismissed.

(d) Mr. Morphew's character and reputation are adversely affected by previous charges, for which investigations clearly established probable cause. HIs reputation was so poor in Chafee County that a judge was compelled to change venue. He claims this reputation has followed him even to Arizona and affected his ability to get work and make friends. Assuming this is true, it seems unlikely that he will establish relationships and get work in Colorado.

(e) Mr. Morphew's daughter is willing to rent an apartment in Alamosa and host her father as her guest.

(f) The sentence for the charge Mr. Morphew faces is life in prison, the most severe in Colorado criminal law. I give great weight to this factor, as it provides a powerful reason for Mr. Morphew to abscond to avoid it.

(g) Mr. Morphew has faced criminal charges in the past, but all have been dismissed - one after Mr. Morphew completed a period of probation.

(h) There are facts alleged in this case indicating that Mr. Morphew may seek to influence or intimidate witnesses if he is released. There are also facts alleged in this case that he relocated his wife's remains after he was charged with her murder, in violation of Colorado law.

(i) As noted above, there are facts indicating that the defendant is likely to intimidate or harass possible witnesses, and one witness has expressed publicly her fear of him.

(j) There are no facts indicating that Mr. Morphew has strong ties to the community.

Mr. Morphew argues that when he was charged with First Degree Murder in Chaffee County, he posted a large cash bond and fully complied with its terms of release. He suggests that this is compelling evidence that he is not a threat to anyone and that he will appear as required in this case.

But I find that circumstances have changed significantly since that time. He was then a resident of Chafee County, and a neighbor provided his housing: Mr. Morphew is now an Arizona resident, and his daughter would have to relocate to Alamosa temporarily to provide his housing. When his bond was set in Chaffee County, the judge characterized the evidence against him as weak because Suzanne's remains had not been found and there was DNA evidence that seemed to suggest the involvement of another party. The arrest warrant in the case before me clearly indicates those reasons for doubt no longer exist.

Giving great weight to the gravity of the charges, the potential sentence, and the grounds for probable cause articulated by the Grand Jury, and considering Mr. Morphew's lack of ties to the community, the absence of reason to believe the defendant can find work in this jurisdiction, and the other factors recited above, I find that the type of bond, the conditions imposed, and the amount of $3 million are reasonable and necessary to assure that Mr. Morphew will appear in court as required, and to protect witnesses and other members of the community.

 

[scapa]

^^^

Well done. I hereby nominate @Tragg as judge for the Barry Morphew bail hearing, on the understanding that said hearing proceed exactly as above, resulting in the Mountain Lion of Celllblock A remaining right smack where he is.

Thereby ensuring a BAM! for the good guys, and a gigantic sigh of relief for the multitudes of BM victims past and present.

 

[GOBliaison]

The chances of BM getting bail he can make, I'd say are about zero. New Colorado law impacts 1st degree murder charges. Booyah. And besides, he now has no personal ties to the immediate surroundings. And double booyah.

He looked pretty ragged after his first stint in county lock up, will we see more of that, come September?

Couple's months without his beloved guns*, that can wear on a guy.

JMO

Hi @Megnut , et alia !

I missed, I guess, Barr's ever getting his arsenal released to him ??
I do recollect, however, that dismissal w/o prejudice enabled the magistrate to permit the State to continue their custody in the event of a new trial.
___________
Aside:
As "consolation", wasn't he permitted to use bow & arrow - NO CROSSBOW ! - or/and a single-shot muzzle-loader to assuage any irrepressible bwana urges ???
And similarly, memory mists as to who thereupon muttered: "But...but, your Honor, the movant owns neither!"
... Bwana Barr blurtage?
... perhaps an exasperated Eytan ?

Help?​

 

[Momofthreeboys]

So let's consider the factors for setting bail that we know about. I'll pretend I'm the judge.

The conditions I set when the indictment issued are all standard. I set the type as a cash bond, because I don't believe any other type gives me the assurance I need that a defendant charged with first degree murder will comply with those terms. This is true for both rich defendants and indigent defendants.

I presume that Mr. Morphew is eligible for release on bond with the appropriate and least-restrictive conditions. Per the statute, a monetary condition of release must be reasonable in the defendant's circumstances, considering the criteria set forth in the statute, as follows

(a) Mr. Morphew is unemployed and has complained that he cannot get work because public awareness of his previous case has affected his reputation.

(b) Mr. Morphew has no family residing in the 12th Judicial District.

(c) Mr. Morphew lived in Indiana, and his extended family still resides there. He resided in Colorado with his wife and children for a short period, but relocated to Arizona after charges against him in the 11th Judicial District were dismissed.

(d) Mr. Morphew's character and reputation are adversely affected by previous charges, for which investigations clearly established probable cause. HIs reputation was so poor in Chafee County that a judge was compelled to change venue. He claims this reputation has followed him even to Arizona and affected his ability to get work and make friends. Assuming this is true, it seems unlikely that he will establish relationships and get work in Colorado.

(e) Mr. Morphew's daughter is willing to rent an apartment in Alamosa and host her father as her guest.

(f) The sentence for the charge Mr. Morphew faces is life in prison, the most severe in Colorado criminal law. I give great weight to this factor, as it provides a powerful reason for Mr. Morphew to abscond to avoid it.

(g) Mr. Morphew has faced criminal charges in the past, but all have been dismissed - one after Mr. Morphew completed a period of probation.

(h) There are facts alleged in this case indicating that Mr. Morphew may seek to influence or intimidate witnesses if he is released. There are also facts alleged in this case that he relocated his wife's remains after he was charged with her murder, in violation of Colorado law.

(i) As noted above, there are facts indicating that the defendant is likely to intimidate or harass possible witnesses, and one witness has expressed publicly her fear of him.

(j) There are no facts indicating that Mr. Morphew has strong ties to the community.

Mr. Morphew argues that when he was charged with First Degree Murder in Chaffee County, he posted a large cash bond and fully complied with its terms of release. He suggests that this is compelling evidence that he is not a threat to anyone and that he will appear as required in this case.

But I find that circumstances have changed significantly since that time. He was then a resident of Chafee County, and a neighbor provided his housing: Mr. Morphew is now an Arizona resident, and his daughter would have to relocate to Alamosa temporarily to provide his housing. When his bond was set in Chaffee County, the judge characterized the evidence against him as weak because Suzanne's remains had not been found and there was DNA evidence that seemed to suggest the involvement of another party. The arrest warrant in the case before me clearly indicates those reasons for doubt no longer exist.

Giving great weight to the gravity of the charges, the potential sentence, and the grounds for probable cause articulated by the Grand Jury, and considering Mr. Morphew's lack of ties to the community, the absence of reason to believe the defendant can find work in this jurisdiction, and the other factors recited above, I find that the type of bond, the conditions imposed, and the amount of $3 million are reasonable and necessary to assure that Mr. Morphew will appear in court as required, and to protect witnesses and other members of the community.

Your reasoning is strong and I still think they will ask for a bond reduction. We shall see soon I assume. In my opinion it is still a very high bond historically for a single murder 1 charge. And we all know grand jury's are pretty easy to get indictments from though I think this time they hit the proof positive presumption great or at least that seems to be, so everything will end up predicated on the strength of whatever lawyer defends him and their arguments around bond.

 

[waldojabba]

I don’t think there is any question that David and Jane will ask for bail reduction. Barry’s lawyers already told the judge they planned to.

Iirc DB at the July 1 hearing informed the judge that they would challenge the 3m cash bond at next hearing - Sept 2nd. So we can pretty much take that as a lock.

If you look at/ google around/ AI, for bail “comps” in Colo the last couple of years for the same charges - the amounts are pretty high. Of course no circumstances are rver the same.

I think Sept 2 will be a very interesting hearing. I am anxious to see all the players in “action” and what is presented as well as how the judge rules.

IMO re bail for Barry objectively :
He is not a flight risk /
He is not a danger to the public/ his biggest hurdle is of course the amount of bond and the fact it’s a CASH bond.
After that there’s the issue that he has no ties locally or to the state.
The man is a broken down almost 60 yrs old mess who has no job prospects that I can imagine.
Will they claim hardship and ask to move him back in with his aging adoring mother Shirley in Indiana until trial… And then set something up locally during trial? Is that even within the judges discretion to allow?
He would obviously need gps ankle monitor and check ins.

The only risk I see with letting him out is that he knows this it. He is finally backed into that corner that all narcissists hate.

His best bet is to make a Alford (sp) plea deal to get the best accommodations he can. That’s the only card that’s left out there for him that I see. Or if they let him out for bail take a page from Fotis’ book.
I know it’s an unpopular opinion but I see it as a definite option and not a bad one

September is coming up fast

JMO

 

[Seattle1]

I also think they will ask for a bond reduction. The current bond is a huge leap from the original half million bond from the original trial attempt and from all records he was compliant during the original trial attempt. Whether the judge agrees and what that amount ultimately is and whether Morphew can obtain it are totally separate issues.

There's absolutely no comparison here. Morphew was granted bail in 2021 [$500K cash only] when the state failed to satisfy proof evident or presumption great-- the exception to pretrial bond release for a defendant charged with murder in the first degree. Be reminded this was before the 2023 Supreme Court ruling that effectively prevented Judges from denying bail.

 

[Tragg]

I don’t think there is any question that David and Jane will ask for bail reduction. Barry’s lawyers already told the judge they planned to.

Iirc DB at the July 1 hearing informed the judge that they would challenge the 3m cash bond at next hearing - Sept 2nd. So we can pretty much take that as a lock.

If you look at/ google around/ AI, for bail “comps” in Colo the last couple of years for the same charges - the amounts are pretty high. Of course no circumstances are rver the same.

I think Sept 2 will be a very interesting hearing. I am anxious to see all the players in “action” and what is presented as well as how the judge rules.

IMO re bail for Barry objectively :
He is not a flight risk /
He is not a danger to the public/ his biggest hurdle is of course the amount of bond and the fact it’s a CASH bond.
After that there’s the issue that he has no ties locally or to the state.
The man is a broken down almost 60 yrs old mess who has no job prospects that I can imagine.
Will they claim hardship and ask to move him back in with his aging adoring mother Shirley in Indiana until trial… And then set something up locally during trial? Is that even within the judges discretion to allow?
He would obviously need gps ankle monitor and check ins.

The only risk I see with letting him out is that he knows this it. He is finally backed into that corner that all narcissists hate.

His best bet is to make a Alford (sp) plea deal to get the best accommodations he can. That’s the only card that’s left out there for him that I see. Or if they let him out for bail take a page from Fotis’ book.
I know it’s an unpopular opinion but I see it as a definite option and not a bad one

September is coming up fast

JMO

Very interesting! I have not seen an Alford Plea to a murder charge in Colorado. If they have occurred, they must be vanishingly rare.

Generally prosecutors have a duty to do justice in their plea negotiations, but I haven't seen any more specific guidelines for District Attorneys who are approached by defense counsel with an offer of this kind.

Under what conditions would an Alford Plea be considered just? Do they apply in this case? What benefit would Morphew gain by such a plea?

I have never seen a Colorado murder defendant allowed to leave the county, let alone the state, but I suppose there's always a first time.

TBH, I just don't see the judge setting a bond Morphew is likely to make in this case, and I don't see DA Kelly accepting any plea other than straight-up guilty as charged.

 

[Seattle1]

I have never seen a Colorado murder defendant allowed to leave the county, let alone the state, but I suppose there's always a first time.

TBH, I just don't see the judge setting a bond Morphew is likely to make in this case, and I don't see DA Kelly accepting any plea other than straight-up guilty as charged.

^^rsbm^^

It sure hasn't stopped Iris Eytan from arguing countless times for her client to be able to leave the County while out on bond release! And when defending Tom Fallis, she went to the Supreme Court seeking to allow her client to leave the state.

The People of the State of Colorado, v. Thomas Fallis

The People of the State of Colorado, v. Thomas Fallis - 2015 COA 75

law.justia.com

 

[Tragg]

^^rsbm^^

It sure hasn't stopped Iris Eytan from arguing countless times for her client to be able to leave the County while out on bond release! And when defending Tom Fallis, she went to the Supreme Court seeking to allow her client to leave the state.

The People of the State of Colorado, v. Thomas Fallis

The People of the State of Colorado, v. Thomas Fallis - 2015 COA 75

law.justia.com

Thanks for this!! Great research!

We know from experience that defense counsel will keep arguing whatever they can to help their client, within their ethical responsibilities. We understand, but of course we'll be annoyed.

Reading the decision, it looks like Eytan scored an own goal for Team Defense Colorado. The Colorado Court of Appeals did not waste words in upholding Judge Quammen's requirement that Fallis remain in Colorado while his Second Degree Murder charge was pending.

For Morphew's case, the significant finding and conclusion would seem to be:

"The court did not treat [Fallis] as guilty of the charged offense; instead, the court considered, quite properly, the nature of the charged offense and the penalty that would be imposed if he were found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See§ 16-4-103(5)(f), C.R.S. 2014 ('The court may also consider the following criteria as appropriate and relevant in making a determination of the type of bond and conditions of release: [t]he likely sentence, considering the nature [of] the offense presently charged.').

No wiggle room there for Morphew IMO.

 

[Tragg]

^^^

Well done. I hereby nominate @Tragg as judge for the Barry Morphew bail hearing, on the understanding that said hearing proceed exactly as above, resulting in the Mountain Lion of Celllblock A remaining right smack where he is.

Thereby ensuring a BAM! for the good guys, and a gigantic sigh of relief for the multitudes of BM victims past and present.

Swear me in!

 

[Tragg]

From @Seattle1 post above in the thread :

On 7/22/25-- Team BM filed an unopposed Motion (DOC-90) to vacate their oral argument, and requested the Court decide the case on the briefs submitted. They further stated they believed the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the briefs, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument!

Almost as an afterthought, team BM told the Court that the State of Colorado had recently re-filed criminal charges against BM -- the same murder charge, brought in the affidavit and prosecution that was the subject of the appeal. Citing ethical responsibilities, they thought it would be imprudent for them to make any oral statements.

^^This from the powerhouse attorneys BM spent his life savings on--including Jane FB.

On 7/28/25-- in response to the unopposed Motion by BM, the Court was compelled to Order (DOC-91) that in light of the refiling of criminal charges, they directed the parties to file supplemental briefs by 8/4/25, addressing the following questions:

1. Does the refiling of criminal charges impact the issues raised in this appeal such that the appeal should be abated until the criminal case is resolved?

2. If this court decides to proceed with argument in this appeal, what special measures relating to the conduct of oral argument, if any, should the court adopt?
//

@Tragg - do you have a link/source for your response ?

Per the above, the supplemental briefs were due on 8/4/25 - so the ruling you reference must have been in the last two weeks or so?

Appreciate the clarification Public Access to Court Electronic Records | PACER: Federal Court Records

JMO

Thanks for asking! I think @Seattle1 has addressed this, but I should add that my post #118 above was based on public access to case records provided through PACER.GOV, which you reference. I am unfortunately unable to provide a direct link to the minute order I posted, but WS members and others can access it for themselves.

 

[Seattle1]

Thanks for this!! Great research!

We know from experience that defense counsel will keep arguing whatever they can to help their client, within their ethical responsibilities. We understand, but of course we'll be annoyed.

Reading the decision, it looks like Eytan scored an own goal for Team Defense Colorado. The Colorado Court of Appeals did not waste words in upholding Judge Quammen's requirement that Fallis remain in Colorado while his Second Degree Murder charge was pending.

For Morphew's case, the significant finding and conclusion would seem to be:

"The court did not treat [Fallis] as guilty of the charged offense; instead, the court considered, quite properly, the nature of the charged offense and the penalty that would be imposed if he were found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See§ 16-4-103(5)(f), C.R.S. 2014 ('The court may also consider the following criteria as appropriate and relevant in making a determination of the type of bond and conditions of release: [t]he likely sentence, considering the nature [of] the offense presently charged.').

No wiggle room there for Morphew IMO.

I do recall that Eytan was prepared to argue Morphew's bond conditions include a radius extending as far as Gunnison County, but Judge Murphy didn't even allow IE to finish the sentence before interrupting that he was not hearing Morphew leave Chaffee County, period!

I can't recall for certain, but I think once Lama took over, he did grant this. I think IE may have borrowed from her Fallis Supreme Court argument about "being allowed to parent." No need to add more about Lama. JMO

 

[Tragg]

I do recall that Eytan was prepared to argue Morphew's bond conditions include a radius extending as far as Gunnison County, but Judge Murphy didn't even allow IE to finish the sentence before interrupting that he was not hearing Morphew leave Chaffee County, period!

I can't recall for certain, but I think once Lama took over, he did grant this. I think IE may have borrowed from her Fallis Supreme Court argument about "being allowed to parent." No need to add more about Lama. JMO

You're right!

In January 2022 Judge Lama modified the bond conditions to allow Morphew to take day trips to Gunnison to visit his daughters, who testified that it would be "such a blessing" to see him but it was such a hardship for them to come to Maysville .

He was required to return to his residence in Chafee County at night.

The case was dismissed on Stanley's motion three months later.

 

[MassGuy]

Barry wants to be allowed to wear civilian clothes and modified restraints during the upcoming hearing.

Loading…

www.coloradojudicial.gov

 

[Megnut]

Barry wants to be allowed to wear civilian clothes and modified restraints during the upcoming hearing.

Loading…

www.coloradojudicial.gov

Of course he does.

Now will it be his signature jeans and fit T or well they stuff him in a suit?

Hey, I know where a Men's Wearhouse is...

JMO

 

[Inthedetails]

Barry wants to be allowed to wear civilian clothes and modified restraints during the upcoming hearing.

Loading…

www.coloradojudicial.gov

Fair enough. He can change into the prison garb after conviction.

jmopinion