CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #15

[jjenny]

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_22108222/dad-its-wait-wonder

The television was on Nickelodeon.

Not left on.

Just trying to be as accurate as possible and not add word(s) or create more confusion. :seeya:

You don't think that "was on" and "left on" is one and the same?

 

[Salem]

Correct. But that didn't happen, Dylan didn't get to spend that time with MR. Or rather MR didn't get to spend that time with Dylan. So if he was disappeared in the beginning, it would make no sense for it to be Dad. Now on the other hand, there reverse could be true since he disappeared at the beginning of the visit.

I'm thinking that at this point in time, if either parent had a hand in this, they would have told LE. I don't think they would be dragging it out this long. They would know that they were going to be in a world of hurt if they continued to hide Dylan.

I really think it was acquaintance/stranger abduction and I'm praying like heck that someone was out taking pictures of the birds and got a car in the photo.

Also, I think LE needs to physically search the homes/vehicles of the RSOs, especially the child guy that lives on CR 500.

LE says all RSOs have been contacted - but contacted doesn't get it. They need to do physical searches.

Salem

 

[Eileen730]

I don't know about specific rules prohibiting a 13 year old from purchasing a pre-pay cell (you may be right) but there are pre-paid phones made just for kids like Firefly, for example. I'm looking to see what if any might be sold at Walmart or in local convenience stores, etc.

Where is Dylan getting this money?
I dont think Dylan is of age to activate the phone.

 

[Seajay]

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_22108222/dad-its-wait-wonder

The television was on Nickelodeon.

Not left on.

Just trying to be as accurate as possible and not add word(s) or create more confusion. :seeya:

Yes, that's important because for days, I was under the assumption that Dylan was going to spend the night at his friends that first night and when I was asked to link it, there was nothing. I had assumed he was because he was going to his friends that night. Never occurred to me that it would be just to drop by and visit, I was thinking spending the night. I was wrong on that detail because I added something that wasn't there.

 

[LotusPawprint]

I so wish we knew IF DR computer in C Springs was checked for emails, chats, etc. before he even left to meet his dad. lease:

We don't know if he had his own computer or used a shared family computer, do we?

 

[FruitTingles]

I'm thinking that at this point in time, if either parent had a hand in this, they would have told LE. I don't think they would be dragging it out this long. They would know that they were going to be in a world of hurt if they continued to hide Dylan.

I really think it was acquaintance/stranger abduction and I'm praying like heck that someone was out taking pictures of the birds and got a car in the photo.

Also, I think LE needs to physically search the homes/vehicles of the RSOs, especially the child guy that lives on CR 500.

LE says all RSOs have been contacted - but contacted doesn't get it. They need to do physical searches.

Salem

BBM

I agree! But then we have the SO's, 'unregistered' who are just out there roaming around. Yet to be caught.

 

[gngr~snap]

Thank you my baby girl is due on the 4th of January, I wrote the date differently because I'm in Australia hehe.

Yep you're right. Maybe he did like cartoons, maybe he didn't. We just don't know. :sigh:

Well duh! It says Australia right there!!!

So you are on the countdown!!
I never made it that far with either of mine!
I had a 25 weeker and a 34/36 weeker! (they are fine and grown)
Take care!
I am excited for you!

 

[mck16]

DR and MR were there.
DR is missing
Mr is the last to see him.

so all we have is what MR has said.

And I dont feel the same as you.

That is exactly what I said. And it doesn't have to be repeated over and over. I think we all know it.

And I respect your opinion and you right to disagree. thank you.

 

[katydid23]

Well for me this means that Dylan was at MR's house Sun. night because if he had not been there that would have been helpful to the investigation.

:fence:

I think it means that they could not determine either way if Dylan had been there Sunday night. Because if you think about it, determining he was there, or determining he wasn't, either would be helpful in the investigation. IMO, the only thing that would not be helpful, is making no determination.

 

[Seajay]

So will I. Right now I'm :fence: with my tush protected with pillows. (and donuts)

If I eat the donuts, my tush won't need the pillows. :floorlaugh:

 

[FruitTingles]

If I eat the donuts, my tush won't need the pillows. :floorlaugh:

Can anybody spare a donut for the fat preggo lady over here? LOL.


I'm right up there on the fence too! :fence:

 

[LotusPawprint]

Where is Dylan getting this money?
I dont think Dylan is of age to activate the phone.

Allowance?
Mom? - packed him money for his trip?
Dad?

On his fb page he "liked" a product/page called "BillMyParents" which is a prepaid MasterCard debit card for kids 13+. Parents can re-load it for their kids.

These prepaid phones can be ordered online. Maybe someone sent it to him.


It's not an impossible scenario.

 

[Eileen730]

We don't know if he had his own computer or used a shared family computer, do we?

Dad has a computer.

 

[missrugby]

If Dylan's phone was actually shut off at 8pm on Sunday and never turned on again, that is a big problem, IMO. I can't think of any reason he would do that. Wish we knew for sure, 100%.

I think the same thing. I also wonder was it turned off or was the battery dead? It's my understanding if its just turned off it can still be pinged but I'm not sure if that's true.

 

[Ransom]

You don't think that "was on" and "left on" is one and the same?

No, I don't ... thus why I posted the actual words and not "added" words. :seeya:

ETA: Which what I was doing if you followed the conversation(s) (posts) where 1 poster said one thing and another poster "corrected/opinon" with the incorrect information. IMO. HTH.

 

[tiredblondy]

If I eat the donuts, my tush won't need the pillows. :floorlaugh:

Donuts? Powdered are the best!

 

[jennapuppy]

So will I. Right now I'm :fence: with my tush protected with pillows. (and donuts)

Move over :fence: and pass the donuts, please.

 

[gngr~snap]

You don't think that "was on" and "left on" is one and the same?

If it was on when MR left that morning and was still on when he returned yes...

If it was not on when MR left in the morning but was left on when he returned then no?

you are right... unless someone turned it to that channel and left the tv on when kidnapping the boy it is irrelevant.

 

[katydid23]

When my son's friends came over to spend the night or a couple of days they all did that. I'd walk in the room and there would be 3 bookbags with all their clothes laying in a pile beside the bookbag and that pile was the source of their apparel while they were there. I just assumed it was a guy/teenager thing but my daughter did it too and her friends.

or....he could have been looking for that second pay as you go phone I suspect he may have had.

I am Very happily :fence:

Why would he have a pay as you go phone?

 

[tiredblondy]

I think it means that they could not determine either way if Dylan had been there Sunday night. Because if you think about it, determining he was there, or determining he wasn't, either would be helpful in the investigation. IMO, the only thing that would not be helpful, is making no determination.

But maybe they don't want us to know?