It really did sound like a super organized, expensive, well planned out itinerary.
So how did it happen that just 2 months later, he fights to get him to come to town for a Thanksgiving trip, and he makes ZERO plans for them for the week. The most he had planned was to 'maybe bowl or something on wednesday.'
There is a huge difference between the 2 vacations. Since he knew his son was coming for the week, wasn't there something really fun he could have planned for Tuesday or Wednesday? I only say that now because his August trip makes him look like a planner and a creative dad. But this November trip was a mess.
And I don't believe for a minute that he ever seriously considered going to Dylan's new hometown for Thanksgiving. He may have said it was an option because Dylan probably was pushing for it. imo
How do we know how good an employee he was?
Elaine didnt even know what kind of job he has.
I dont think these two spoke to each other at all.
There is definately very bad blood between the two and it has t be pretty horrible for their missing child not be able to mend it JMO
AZgrandma did MR call your son "that boy" or "the boy"?
never
This video is the one I asked about, has alot of the same photos as before in previous videos but there is more to this one...Dylan has natural curl to his hair when it's longer at least in this video.
516992501644744 10228 - YouTube
The biggest question I have now, for myself, is this: Was what happened to Dylan intentional or accidental?
Again, we are all able to see things so differently. I watch that interview ( the "uncut" one that clearly is cut) every time someone else references it, just to see what I have missed - and I honestly don't see anything sinister. To me he seems like a dad who is just holding it together. He is red eyed, tired and drawn looking, and sounds sincere to me. I fear none of us would fare very well if we had our every word and nuance ( in one clip) dissected, quoted and analysed in such depth, and by so many.
I'm still preferring to look at what little is actually known and consider possibilities that don't point towards MR. What I am seeing are comments everywhere (not just here) that are based on the presumption that it's all about MR - even though IMO there is no real evidence or clues leading to anyone. MOO, but surely he can't just be guilty by default.
IMO a lot of things that have been tossed around as suggestions/ opinions have somehow morphed into facts. I have read them myself repeatedly and squirmed, and wondered how they have come to be quoted or tossed out there and simply accepted as known facts.
I keep checking in here because like everyone else I really want some news about Dylan, or something from LE to discuss - and I know new info makes it to these boards very quickly thanks to interested posters and their links.Right now I feel I've run out of puff though - it's become hard work for me because I am so uncomfortable. I can't get past the notion that we have no real evidence that MR is not a grieving dad.
:moo:
I think accident!
Again, we are all able to see things so differently. I watch that interview ( the "uncut" one that clearly is cut) every time someone else references it, just to see what I have missed - and I honestly don't see anything sinister. To me he seems like a dad who is just holding it together. He is red eyed, tired and drawn looking, and sounds sincere to me. I fear none of us would fare very well if we had our every word and nuance ( in one clip) dissected, quoted and analysed in such depth, and by so many.
I'm still preferring to look at what little is actually known and consider possibilities that don't point towards MR. What I am seeing are comments everywhere (not just here) that are based on the presumption that it's all about MR - even though IMO there is no real evidence or clues leading to anyone. MOO, but surely he can't just be guilty by default.
IMO a lot of things that have been tossed around as suggestions/ opinions have somehow morphed into facts. I have read them myself repeatedly and squirmed, and wondered how they have come to be quoted or tossed out there and simply accepted as known facts.
I keep checking in here because like everyone else I really want some news about Dylan, or something from LE to discuss - and I know new info makes it to these boards very quickly thanks to interested posters and their links.Right now I feel I've run out of puff though - it's become hard work for me because I am so uncomfortable. I can't get past the notion that we have no real evidence that MR is not a grieving dad.
:moo:
Again, we are all able to see things so differently. I watch that interview ( the "uncut" one that clearly is cut) every time someone else references it, just to see what I have missed - and I honestly don't see anything sinister. To me he seems like a dad who is just holding it together. He is red eyed, tired and drawn looking, and sounds sincere to me. I fear none of us would fare very well if we had our every word and nuance ( in one clip) dissected, quoted and analysed in such depth, and by so many.
I'm still preferring to look at what little is actually known and consider possibilities that don't point towards MR. What I am seeing are comments everywhere (not just here) that are based on the presumption that it's all about MR - even though IMO there is no real evidence or clues leading to anyone. MOO, but surely he can't just be guilty by default.
IMO a lot of things that have been tossed around as suggestions/ opinions have somehow morphed into facts. I have read them myself repeatedly and squirmed, and wondered how they have come to be quoted or tossed out there and simply accepted as known facts.
I keep checking in here because like everyone else I really want some news about Dylan, or something from LE to discuss - and I know new info makes it to these boards very quickly thanks to interested posters and their links.Right now I feel I've run out of puff though - it's become hard work for me because I am so uncomfortable. I can't get past the notion that we have no real evidence that MR is not a grieving dad.
:moo:
I think he was intentionally taken by someone other than his father.
<snipped>
I'm still preferring to look at what little is actually known and consider possibilities that don't point towards MR. What I am seeing are comments everywhere (not just here) that are based on the presumption that it's all about MR - even though IMO there is no real evidence or clues leading to anyone. MOO, but surely he can't just be guilty by default.
IMO a lot of things that have been tossed around as suggestions/ opinions have somehow morphed into facts. I have read them myself repeatedly and squirmed, and wondered how they have come to be quoted or tossed out there and simply accepted as known facts.
I keep checking in here because like everyone else I really want some news about Dylan, or something from LE to discuss - and I know new info makes it to these boards very quickly thanks to interested posters and their links.Right now I feel I've run out of puff though - it's become hard work for me because I am so uncomfortable. I can't get past the notion that we have no real evidence that MR is not a grieving dad.
:moo:
If Dylan
If Dylan was last with Mom id be looking at her but he wasnt!
He was with his dad
I have not seen Grief from this father! But thats neither here nor there.
If LE would rule him out we could move on!
JMO
LE hasn't ruled anyone out.
IMO, I think Mark has some major issues I dont think he set out to harm his son and if it turns out he did I do think it was spontaneous and something he couldnt controll unfortunately. All JMO