scorekeeper
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2011
- Messages
- 12,369
- Reaction score
- 54
the FMDR page says they had a good turnout tonight for the dinner and silent auction.
Can't think of any.What would be the reason why someone, besides a sexual predator, would "hold" Dylan for two months? It seems that JK's plan revolves around the belief that the abductor is not some sicko, that he made a very bad "mistake", that he is simply a sad person.
sorry if this has already been posted
http://www.coloradoconnection.com/news/story.aspx?id=849266#.UPi3NCdEHys
Elaine said the search continues to be hindered by Dylan's Father. She said he will not speak to her about Dylan's disappearance.
"My gut feeling is that Dylan's dad had something to do or knows something more than he's giving information about," she said. "I wish he would talk to us but he won't do that."
This is an interesting juxtapose. On one hand you accuse MR of having something to do with Dylan's disappearance, then on another you wonder why he won't talk to you.
http://www.coloradoconnection.com/news/story.aspx?id=849266#.UPi5t2f-jG9
Here's my opinion on this. Elaine believes MR had something to do with Dylan's disappearance. I don't know that she necessarily believes that he harmed him, but believes he's involved. I think she has tried and tried to get MR to talk to her to no avail. So at this point she's trying to call him out.
JMHO
She's just being honest.
Except the 'official' Facebook page is planning a big state-by-state social media campaign. There would be no reason to do that if they thought MR did it.
If it was done only to make "MR feel safe", I think many would feel used when they could have been promoting true missing child cases.
While going after a fly you might try to lure them in with honey at first. When that doesn't work you go after them with a fly swatter.![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm sure she is being honest. I just found her comments interesting. In my opinion if she wants any dialog with MR, accusing him of wrong doing is not a good way of achieving that goal. MOO.
I'm sure she is being honest. I just found her comments interesting. In my opinion if she wants any dialog with MR, accusing him of wrong doing is not a good way of achieving that goal. MOO.
He will likely never communicate regardless of what she or anyone does or doesn't do. MOO
Maybe. But if he feels that he's being attacked he sure won't. MOO.
Maybe ex husbands can tell when their ex wives are being less than honest when presenting their "honey" and decide not to talk to them. MOO.I get that. This woman is desperate for answers.
At first I think she lashed out at MR out of pure shock and anger. I would have done the same when I found out my child was missing.
Then I think she tried baiting him with honey, to no avail.
Now I think the fly swatter is out.
JMHO
He will likely never communicate regardless of what she or anyone does or doesn't do. MOO
I agree, but it's possible he may get mad enough to come out & speak to the press...that maybe what she is hoping??? IDK
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.