I'm thinking as far as court and custody were concerned and I don't know any different since we are not allowed to sleuth those records, but my thought on this was, ER got a better job that paid more money in CS. She asked to take Dylan there so she could take the job. MR didn't like the idea of Dylan being further away. When he could see his child, it was more convenient to have him closer, where he could also see him more often, so I imagine he was not a happy camper about that.
I think ER presented her case for advancement and pay increase for her job so the judge approved the move. I can see MR not being happy about it. That supposedly got worked out on September 21 st from what I understand.
Now they have to have alternate time for the holidays with Dylan. Mark had his turn first, then Elaine was going to get Christmas. Next year Elaine would probably get Thanksgiving, Mark would get Christmas. This was the first holiday since the decision was made. It was no doubt a compromise.
All the other times Mark had Dylan, nothing happened. We don't know how often he spent with his dad, or spent the night or went on vacations in the years since they parents filed for divorce.
I think a bigger deal has been made out of this "court ordered, forced visitation" thing.
My son is getting a divorce, he had the kids for Thanksgiving, she'll have them for Christmas. No court involvement yet, but I imagine when the divorce is final, something will be in writing about the agreement they've made. I guess that would now be "court ordered, forced visitation?"