- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Messages
- 29,592
- Reaction score
- 695,945
According to KK's statement to LE, PF wanted her to kill KB and she couldn't bring herself to do it. Why is it such a stretch to believe she wouldn't find someone else to do it for her?
It isn't an "other" theory. PF has been charged with solicitation. To me, it doesn't matter who was solicited whether it was KK or someone else.
Planting a little blood (if it was blood) isn't staging a crime scene. There needs to be a lot of blood to the point there was no chance for survival.
I don't believe PF would premeditate a killing in a townhome using bloody violence, remove the body, purse and cell phone but leave behind bloody, incriminating evidence including the murder weapon, one of KB's teeth and risk someone finding the scene while KK made the long trip from Idaho. He didn't need to use a ball bat to kill KB. He was much bigger and could have used his bare hands, a choke hold or poisoned her coffee with the drugs KK intended to use.
JMO
It’s “a stretch,” because the evidence in no way supports it.
This idea that PF wouldn’t do anything as dumb as leaving a bloody crime scene or using a baseball bat as a weapon, is the definition of “weak sauce.”
This guy didn’t know how cell phones work.
There is no evidence that anyone other than PF murdered Kelsey, nor is there evidence that anything was planted.
Stupidity is not a defense.